提交 99dc8292 编写于 作者: J Jerome Marchand 提交者: Linus Torvalds

procfs: fix numbering in /proc/locks

The lock number in /proc/locks (first field) is implemented by a counter
(private field of struct seq_file) which is incremented at each call of
locks_show() and reset to 1 in locks_start() whatever the offset is.  It
should be reset according to the actual position in the list.  Because of
this, the numbering erratically restarts at 1 several times when reading a
long /proc/locks file.

Moreover, locks_show() can be called twice to print a single line thus
skipping a number.  The counter should be incremented in locks_next().

And last, pos is a loff_t, which can be bigger than a pointer, so we don't
use the pointer as an integer anymore, and allocate a loff_t instead.
Signed-off-by: NJerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 4199ca77
...@@ -2109,7 +2109,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_cancel_lock); ...@@ -2109,7 +2109,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_cancel_lock);
#include <linux/seq_file.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl, static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
int id, char *pfx) loff_t id, char *pfx)
{ {
struct inode *inode = NULL; struct inode *inode = NULL;
unsigned int fl_pid; unsigned int fl_pid;
...@@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl, ...@@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
if (fl->fl_file != NULL) if (fl->fl_file != NULL)
inode = fl->fl_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode; inode = fl->fl_file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
seq_printf(f, "%d:%s ", id, pfx); seq_printf(f, "%lld:%s ", id, pfx);
if (IS_POSIX(fl)) { if (IS_POSIX(fl)) {
seq_printf(f, "%6s %s ", seq_printf(f, "%6s %s ",
(fl->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS) ? "ACCESS" : "POSIX ", (fl->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS) ? "ACCESS" : "POSIX ",
...@@ -2185,24 +2185,27 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v) ...@@ -2185,24 +2185,27 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
fl = list_entry(v, struct file_lock, fl_link); fl = list_entry(v, struct file_lock, fl_link);
lock_get_status(f, fl, (long)f->private, ""); lock_get_status(f, fl, *((loff_t *)f->private), "");
list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block) list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block)
lock_get_status(f, bfl, (long)f->private, " ->"); lock_get_status(f, bfl, *((loff_t *)f->private), " ->");
f->private++;
return 0; return 0;
} }
static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos) static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
{ {
loff_t *p = f->private;
lock_flocks(); lock_flocks();
f->private = (void *)1; *p = (*pos + 1);
return seq_list_start(&file_lock_list, *pos); return seq_list_start(&file_lock_list, *pos);
} }
static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos) static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{ {
loff_t *p = f->private;
++*p;
return seq_list_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos); return seq_list_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos);
} }
...@@ -2220,14 +2223,14 @@ static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = { ...@@ -2220,14 +2223,14 @@ static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
static int locks_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) static int locks_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{ {
return seq_open(filp, &locks_seq_operations); return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations, sizeof(loff_t));
} }
static const struct file_operations proc_locks_operations = { static const struct file_operations proc_locks_operations = {
.open = locks_open, .open = locks_open,
.read = seq_read, .read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek, .llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release, .release = seq_release_private,
}; };
static int __init proc_locks_init(void) static int __init proc_locks_init(void)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册