提交 98ce2ded 编写于 作者: L Liu Bo 提交者: Chris Mason

Btrfs: fix abnormal long waiting in fsync

xfstests generic/127 detected this problem.

With commit 7fc34a62, now fsync will only flush
data within the passed range.  This is the cause of the above problem,
-- btrfs's fsync has a stage called 'sync log' which will wait for all the
ordered extents it've recorded to finish.

In xfstests/generic/127, with mixed operations such as truncate, fallocate,
punch hole, and mapwrite, we get some pre-allocated extents, and mapwrite will
mmap, and then msync.  And I find that msync will wait for quite a long time
(about 20s in my case), thanks to ftrace, it turns out that the previous
fallocate calls 'btrfs_wait_ordered_range()' to flush dirty pages, but as the
range of dirty pages may be larger than 'btrfs_wait_ordered_range()' wants,
there can be some ordered extents created but not getting corresponding pages
flushed, then they're left in memory until we fsync which runs into the
stage 'sync log', and fsync will just wait for the system writeback thread
to flush those pages and get ordered extents finished, so the latency is
inevitable.

This adds a flush similar to btrfs_start_ordered_extent() in
btrfs_wait_logged_extents() to fix that.
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
上级 abdd2e80
......@@ -484,8 +484,19 @@ void btrfs_wait_logged_extents(struct btrfs_root *log, u64 transid)
log_list);
list_del_init(&ordered->log_list);
spin_unlock_irq(&log->log_extents_lock[index]);
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE, &ordered->flags) &&
!test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT, &ordered->flags)) {
struct inode *inode = ordered->inode;
u64 start = ordered->file_offset;
u64 end = ordered->file_offset + ordered->len - 1;
WARN_ON(!inode);
filemap_fdatawrite_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
}
wait_event(ordered->wait, test_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE,
&ordered->flags));
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
spin_lock_irq(&log->log_extents_lock[index]);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册