提交 7e415282 编写于 作者: M Murilo Opsfelder Araujo 提交者: Michael S. Tsirkin

virtio-pci: Remove wrong address verification in vp_del_vqs()

GCC 12 enhanced -Waddress when comparing array address to null [0],
which warns:

    drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c: In function ‘vp_del_vqs’:
    drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:257:29: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the pointer operand in ‘vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks + (sizetype)((long unsigned int)i * 256)’ must not be NULL [-Waddress]
      257 |                         if (vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i])
          |                             ^~~~~~

In fact, the verification is comparing the result of a pointer
arithmetic, the address "msix_affinity_masks + i", which will always
evaluate to true.

Under the hood, free_cpumask_var() calls kfree(), which is safe to pass
NULL, not requiring non-null verification.  So remove the verification
to make compiler happy (happy compiler, happy life).

[0] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103Signed-off-by: NMurilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220415023002.49805-1-muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NChristophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>
上级 7a836a2a
......@@ -254,8 +254,7 @@ void vp_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
if (vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks) {
for (i = 0; i < vp_dev->msix_vectors; i++)
if (vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i])
free_cpumask_var(vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i]);
free_cpumask_var(vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i]);
}
if (vp_dev->msix_enabled) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册