libbpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__

mainline inclusion
from mainline-5.16-rc1
commit 3930198d
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5EUVD
CVE: NA

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=3930198dc9a0720a2b6561c67e55859ec51b73f9

-------------------------------------------------

Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined
__BYTE_ORDER for consistency.
Signed-off-by: NIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-3-iii@linux.ibm.com
(cherry picked from commit 3930198d)
Signed-off-by: NWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>

Conflicts:
	tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
Signed-off-by: NWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>

tools/lib/bpf/btf.c

@@ -533,9 +533,9 @@ int btf__set_pointer_size(struct btf *btf, size_t ptr_sz)
 
 static bool is_host_big_endian(void)
 {
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	return false;
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 	return true;
 #else
 # error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__"

tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c

@@ -1584,10 +1584,10 @@ static int btf_dump_get_bitfield_value(struct btf_dump *d,
 	 */
 	nr_copy_bits = bit_sz + bits_offset;
 	nr_copy_bytes = t->size;
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	for (i = nr_copy_bytes - 1; i >= 0; i--)
 		num = num * 256 + bytes[i];
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_copy_bytes; i++)
 		num = num * 256 + bytes[i];
 #else
@@ -1697,10 +1697,10 @@ static int btf_dump_int_data(struct btf_dump *d,
 		/* avoid use of __int128 as some 32-bit platforms do not
 		 * support it.
 		 */
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 		lsi = ints[0];
 		msi = ints[1];
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 		lsi = ints[1];
 		msi = ints[0];
 #else

tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c

@@ -1270,10 +1270,10 @@ static int bpf_object__elf_init(struct bpf_object *obj)
 
 static int bpf_object__check_endianness(struct bpf_object *obj)
 {
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	if (obj->efile.ehdr->e_ident[EI_DATA] == ELFDATA2LSB)
 		return 0;
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 	if (obj->efile.ehdr->e_ident[EI_DATA] == ELFDATA2MSB)
 		return 0;
 #else

tools/lib/bpf/linker.c

@@ -323,12 +323,12 @@ static int init_output_elf(struct bpf_linker *linker, const char *file)
 
 	linker->elf_hdr->e_machine = EM_BPF;
 	linker->elf_hdr->e_type = ET_REL;
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	linker->elf_hdr->e_ident[EI_DATA] = ELFDATA2LSB;
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 	linker->elf_hdr->e_ident[EI_DATA] = ELFDATA2MSB;
 #else
-#error "Unknown __BYTE_ORDER"
+#error "Unknown __BYTE_ORDER__"
 #endif
 
 	/* STRTAB */
@@ -538,12 +538,12 @@ static int linker_load_obj_file(struct bpf_linker *linker, const char *filename,
 				const struct bpf_linker_file_opts *opts,
 				struct src_obj *obj)
 {
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 	const int host_endianness = ELFDATA2LSB;
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
 	const int host_endianness = ELFDATA2MSB;
 #else
-#error "Unknown __BYTE_ORDER"
+#error "Unknown __BYTE_ORDER__"
 #endif
 	int err = 0;
 	Elf_Scn *scn;

tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c

@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int bpf_core_calc_field_relo(const char *prog_name,
 			*validate = true; /* signedness is never ambiguous */
 		break;
 	case BPF_FIELD_LSHIFT_U64:
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
 		*val = 64 - (bit_off + bit_sz - byte_off  * 8);
 #else
 		*val = (8 - byte_sz) * 8 + (bit_off - byte_off * 8);