From 6b5e1223d9c3fae19b1a2acd789d9dab97de67c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:21:03 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] coda: don't bother with find_inode_number() the fallback it's using for dcache misses is actually the same value we would've used for inumber anyway. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/coda/dir.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/coda/dir.c b/fs/coda/dir.c index 87e0ee9f4465..14a14808320c 100644 --- a/fs/coda/dir.c +++ b/fs/coda/dir.c @@ -487,13 +487,7 @@ static int coda_venus_readdir(struct file *coda_file, struct dir_context *ctx) /* skip null entries */ if (vdir->d_fileno && name.len) { - /* try to look up this entry in the dcache, that way - * userspace doesn't have to worry about breaking - * getcwd by having mismatched inode numbers for - * internal volume mountpoints. */ - ino = find_inode_number(de, &name); - if (!ino) ino = vdir->d_fileno; - + ino = vdir->d_fileno; type = CDT2DT(vdir->d_type); if (!dir_emit(ctx, name.name, name.len, ino, type)) break; -- GitLab