bpf: Exempt CAP_BPF from checks against bpf_jit_limit

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.71
commit 59efda5073abb4fff2ce8c90ca9c2d25882e84a4
bugzilla: 182981 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4I3KD

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=59efda5073abb4fff2ce8c90ca9c2d25882e84a4

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 8a98ae12 ]

When introducing CAP_BPF, bpf_jit_charge_modmem() was not changed to treat
programs with CAP_BPF as privileged for the purpose of JIT memory allocation.
This means that a program without CAP_BPF can block a program with CAP_BPF
from loading a program.

Fix this by checking bpf_capable() in bpf_jit_charge_modmem().

Fixes: 2c78ee89 ("bpf: Implement CAP_BPF")
Signed-off-by: NLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210922111153.19843-1-lmb@cloudflare.comSigned-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

kernel/bpf/core.c

@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ int bpf_jit_charge_modmem(u32 pages)
 {
 	if (atomic_long_add_return(pages, &bpf_jit_current) >
 	    (bpf_jit_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
-		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
+		if (!bpf_capable()) {
 			atomic_long_sub(pages, &bpf_jit_current);
 			return -EPERM;
 		}