diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h index 9b4477acb554e2f54cc24be6597f07e5486dec43..9a59301cd014133c708d337455e4c263213b564c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h @@ -32,11 +32,16 @@ struct kvm_sys_reg_table { struct kvm_sys_reg_target_table { struct kvm_sys_reg_table table64; + struct kvm_sys_reg_table table32; }; void kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(unsigned int target, struct kvm_sys_reg_target_table *table); +int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run); +int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run); +int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run); +int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run); int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run); #define kvm_coproc_table_init kvm_sys_reg_table_init diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index 4766b7f3515e28f90195c657f1b1ec19825f6d2b..9beaca0334375a0be2e189fb8714c38b56ea2203 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = { [ESR_EL2_EC_WFI] = kvm_handle_wfi, + [ESR_EL2_EC_CP15_32] = kvm_handle_cp15_32, + [ESR_EL2_EC_CP15_64] = kvm_handle_cp15_64, + [ESR_EL2_EC_CP14_MR] = kvm_handle_cp14_access, + [ESR_EL2_EC_CP14_LS] = kvm_handle_cp14_load_store, + [ESR_EL2_EC_CP14_64] = kvm_handle_cp14_access, + [ESR_EL2_EC_HVC32] = handle_hvc, + [ESR_EL2_EC_SMC32] = handle_smc, [ESR_EL2_EC_HVC64] = handle_hvc, [ESR_EL2_EC_SMC64] = handle_smc, [ESR_EL2_EC_SYS64] = kvm_handle_sys_reg, diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 52fff0ae3442757d98894349a3433f9ac1d14f92..94923609753b2ae91715080fff2cd544281c8621 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ * types are different. My gut feeling is that it should be pretty * easy to merge, but that would be an ABI breakage -- again. VFP * would also need to be abstracted. + * + * For AArch32, we only take care of what is being trapped. Anything + * that has to do with init and userspace access has to go via the + * 64bit interface. */ /* 3 bits per cache level, as per CLIDR, but non-existent caches always 0 */ @@ -166,6 +170,16 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { { Op0(0b01), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0111), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b010), access_dcsw }, + /* TEECR32_EL1 */ + { Op0(0b10), Op1(0b010), CRn(0b0000), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000), + NULL, reset_val, TEECR32_EL1, 0 }, + /* TEEHBR32_EL1 */ + { Op0(0b10), Op1(0b010), CRn(0b0001), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000), + NULL, reset_val, TEEHBR32_EL1, 0 }, + /* DBGVCR32_EL2 */ + { Op0(0b10), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0000), CRm(0b0111), Op2(0b000), + NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 }, + /* MPIDR_EL1 */ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0000), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b101), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 }, @@ -276,6 +290,39 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { /* TPIDRRO_EL0 */ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1101), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b011), NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDRRO_EL0 }, + + /* DACR32_EL2 */ + { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0011), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000), + NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 }, + /* IFSR32_EL2 */ + { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0101), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b001), + NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 }, + /* FPEXC32_EL2 */ + { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0101), CRm(0b0011), Op2(0b000), + NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x70 }, +}; + +/* Trapped cp15 registers */ +static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = { + /* + * DC{C,I,CI}SW operations: + */ + { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 6), Op2( 2), access_dcsw }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(10), Op2( 2), access_dcsw }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_dcsw }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 7), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 0), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 1), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 2), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 0), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 1), pm_fake }, + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), pm_fake }, }; /* Target specific emulation tables */ @@ -288,13 +335,20 @@ void kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(unsigned int target, } /* Get specific register table for this target. */ -static const struct sys_reg_desc *get_target_table(unsigned target, size_t *num) +static const struct sys_reg_desc *get_target_table(unsigned target, + bool mode_is_64, + size_t *num) { struct kvm_sys_reg_target_table *table; table = target_tables[target]; - *num = table->table64.num; - return table->table64.table; + if (mode_is_64) { + *num = table->table64.num; + return table->table64.table; + } else { + *num = table->table32.num; + return table->table32.table; + } } static const struct sys_reg_desc *find_reg(const struct sys_reg_params *params, @@ -322,13 +376,126 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc *find_reg(const struct sys_reg_params *params, return NULL; } +int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); + return 1; +} + +int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); + return 1; +} + +static void emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct sys_reg_params *params) +{ + size_t num; + const struct sys_reg_desc *table, *r; + + table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, false, &num); + + /* Search target-specific then generic table. */ + r = find_reg(params, table, num); + if (!r) + r = find_reg(params, cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs)); + + if (likely(r)) { + /* + * Not having an accessor means that we have + * configured a trap that we don't know how to + * handle. This certainly qualifies as a gross bug + * that should be fixed right away. + */ + BUG_ON(!r->access); + + if (likely(r->access(vcpu, params, r))) { + /* Skip instruction, since it was emulated */ + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); + return; + } + /* If access function fails, it should complain. */ + } + + kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP15 access at: %08lx\n", *vcpu_pc(vcpu)); + print_sys_reg_instr(params); + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); +} + +/** + * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer + * @run: The kvm_run struct + */ +int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + struct sys_reg_params params; + u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu); + int Rt2 = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf; + + params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf; + params.Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf; + params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0); + + params.Op0 = 0; + params.Op1 = (hsr >> 16) & 0xf; + params.Op2 = 0; + params.CRn = 0; + + /* + * Massive hack here. Store Rt2 in the top 32bits so we only + * have one register to deal with. As we use the same trap + * backends between AArch32 and AArch64, we get away with it. + */ + if (params.is_write) { + u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt); + val &= 0xffffffff; + val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) << 32; + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt) = val; + } + + emulate_cp15(vcpu, ¶ms); + + /* Do the opposite hack for the read side */ + if (!params.is_write) { + u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt); + val >>= 32; + *vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) = val; + } + + return 1; +} + +/** + * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer + * @run: The kvm_run struct + */ +int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + struct sys_reg_params params; + u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu); + + params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf; + params.Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf; + params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0); + params.CRn = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf; + params.Op0 = 0; + params.Op1 = (hsr >> 14) & 0x7; + params.Op2 = (hsr >> 17) & 0x7; + + emulate_cp15(vcpu, ¶ms); + return 1; +} + static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_params *params) { size_t num; const struct sys_reg_desc *table, *r; - table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num); + table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num); /* Search target-specific then generic table. */ r = find_reg(params, table, num); @@ -438,7 +605,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc *index_to_sys_reg_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (!index_to_params(id, ¶ms)) return NULL; - table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num); + table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num); r = find_reg(¶ms, table, num); if (!r) r = find_reg(¶ms, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs)); @@ -762,7 +929,7 @@ static int walk_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uind) size_t num; /* We check for duplicates here, to allow arch-specific overrides. */ - i1 = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num); + i1 = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num); end1 = i1 + num; i2 = sys_reg_descs; end2 = sys_reg_descs + ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs); @@ -874,7 +1041,7 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) /* Generic chip reset first (so target could override). */ reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs)); - table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num); + table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num); reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, table, num); for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++)