tcp: Fix data-races around sysctl_tcp_reordering.

stable inclusion
from stable-v4.19.254
commit 59ce170d33dd8c3c95049765ffc311584585e366
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5Q0SQ
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit 46778cd1 ]

While reading sysctl_tcp_reordering, it can be changed concurrently.
Thus, we need to add READ_ONCE() to its readers.

Fixes: 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: NKuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>

net/ipv4/tcp.c

@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ void tcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
 	tp->snd_cwnd_clamp = ~0;
 	tp->mss_cache = TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
 
-	tp->reordering = sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering;
+	tp->reordering = READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering);
 	tcp_assign_congestion_control(sk);
 
 	tp->tsoffset = 0;

net/ipv4/tcp_input.c

@@ -1986,6 +1986,7 @@ void tcp_enter_loss(struct sock *sk)
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 	bool new_recovery = icsk->icsk_ca_state < TCP_CA_Recovery;
+	u8 reordering;
 
 	tcp_timeout_mark_lost(sk);
 
@@ -2006,10 +2007,12 @@ void tcp_enter_loss(struct sock *sk)
 	/* Timeout in disordered state after receiving substantial DUPACKs
 	 * suggests that the degree of reordering is over-estimated.
 	 */
+	reordering = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering);
 	if (icsk->icsk_ca_state <= TCP_CA_Disorder &&
-	    tp->sacked_out >= net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering)
+	    tp->sacked_out >= reordering)
 		tp->reordering = min_t(unsigned int, tp->reordering,
-				       net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering);
+				       reordering);
+
 	tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Loss);
 	tp->high_seq = tp->snd_nxt;
 	tcp_ecn_queue_cwr(tp);
@@ -3306,7 +3309,8 @@ static inline bool tcp_may_raise_cwnd(const struct sock *sk, const int flag)
 	 * new SACK or ECE mark may first advance cwnd here and later reduce
 	 * cwnd in tcp_fastretrans_alert() based on more states.
 	 */
-	if (tcp_sk(sk)->reordering > sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering)
+	if (tcp_sk(sk)->reordering >
+	    READ_ONCE(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering))
 		return flag & FLAG_FORWARD_PROGRESS;
 
 	return flag & FLAG_DATA_ACKED;

net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c

@@ -425,7 +425,8 @@ void tcp_update_metrics(struct sock *sk)
 		if (!tcp_metric_locked(tm, TCP_METRIC_REORDERING)) {
 			val = tcp_metric_get(tm, TCP_METRIC_REORDERING);
 			if (val < tp->reordering &&
-			    tp->reordering != net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering)
+			    tp->reordering !=
+			    READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_reordering))
 				tcp_metric_set(tm, TCP_METRIC_REORDERING,
 					       tp->reordering);
 		}