cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid calculation for max/min

When requested from cpufreq to set policy, look into _pss and get
control values, instead of using max/min perf calculations. These
calculation misses next control state in boundary conditions.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NKristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c

@@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ struct perf_limits {
 	int max_sysfs_pct;
 	int min_policy_pct;
 	int min_sysfs_pct;
+	int max_perf_ctl;
+	int min_perf_ctl;
 };
 
 static struct perf_limits limits = {
@@ -176,6 +178,8 @@ static struct perf_limits limits = {
 	.max_sysfs_pct = 100,
 	.min_policy_pct = 0,
 	.min_sysfs_pct = 0,
+	.max_perf_ctl = 0,
+	.min_perf_ctl = 0,
 };
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
@@ -909,12 +913,23 @@ static void intel_pstate_get_min_max(struct cpudata *cpu, int *min, int *max)
 	 * policy, or by cpu specific default values determined through
 	 * experimentation.
 	 */
-	max_perf_adj = fp_toint(mul_fp(int_tofp(max_perf), limits.max_perf));
-	*max = clamp_t(int, max_perf_adj,
-			cpu->pstate.min_pstate, cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate);
+	if (limits.max_perf_ctl && limits.max_sysfs_pct >=
+						limits.max_policy_pct) {
+		*max = limits.max_perf_ctl;
+	} else {
+		max_perf_adj = fp_toint(mul_fp(int_tofp(max_perf),
+					limits.max_perf));
+		*max = clamp_t(int, max_perf_adj, cpu->pstate.min_pstate,
+			       cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate);
+	}
 
-	min_perf = fp_toint(mul_fp(int_tofp(max_perf), limits.min_perf));
+	if (limits.min_perf_ctl) {
+		*min = limits.min_perf_ctl;
+	} else {
+		min_perf = fp_toint(mul_fp(int_tofp(max_perf),
+				    limits.min_perf));
 		*min = clamp_t(int, min_perf, cpu->pstate.min_pstate, max_perf);
+	}
 }
 
 static void intel_pstate_set_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int pstate, bool force)
@@ -1184,6 +1199,12 @@ static unsigned int intel_pstate_get(unsigned int cpu_num)
 
 static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
+	struct cpudata *cpu;
+	int i;
+#endif
+	pr_debug("intel_pstate: %s max %u policy->max %u\n", __func__,
+		 policy->cpuinfo.max_freq, policy->max);
 	if (!policy->cpuinfo.max_freq)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -1196,6 +1217,8 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		limits.max_perf_pct = 100;
 		limits.max_perf = int_tofp(1);
 		limits.no_turbo = 0;
+		limits.max_perf_ctl = 0;
+		limits.min_perf_ctl = 0;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -1216,6 +1239,23 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	limits.min_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.min_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
 	limits.max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits.max_perf_pct), int_tofp(100));
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
+	cpu = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];
+	for (i = 0; i < cpu->acpi_perf_data.state_count; i++) {
+		int control;
+
+		control = convert_to_native_pstate_format(cpu, i);
+		if (control * cpu->pstate.scaling == policy->max)
+			limits.max_perf_ctl = control;
+		if (control * cpu->pstate.scaling == policy->min)
+			limits.min_perf_ctl = control;
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("intel_pstate: max %u policy_max %u perf_ctl [0x%x-0x%x]\n",
+		 policy->cpuinfo.max_freq, policy->max, limits.min_perf_ctl,
+		 limits.max_perf_ctl);
+#endif
+
 	if (hwp_active)
 		intel_pstate_hwp_set();