diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index 1ff103299c28f2280b7b110c44a339960ceb6fab..c14883f5a4b530ccbbc10a18f186a24d7e2cc921 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ struct sem_queue { struct sembuf *sops; /* array of pending operations */ struct sembuf *blocking; /* the operation that blocked */ int nsops; /* number of operations */ - int alter; /* does *sops alter the array? */ + bool alter; /* does *sops alter the array? */ + bool dupsop; /* sops on more than one sem_num */ }; /* Each task has a list of undo requests. They are executed automatically @@ -587,15 +588,23 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(semget, key_t, key, int, nsems, int, semflg) } /** - * perform_atomic_semop - Perform (if possible) a semaphore operation + * perform_atomic_semop[_slow] - Attempt to perform semaphore + * operations on a given array. * @sma: semaphore array * @q: struct sem_queue that describes the operation * + * Caller blocking are as follows, based the value + * indicated by the semaphore operation (sem_op): + * + * (1) >0 never blocks. + * (2) 0 (wait-for-zero operation): semval is non-zero. + * (3) <0 attempting to decrement semval to a value smaller than zero. + * * Returns 0 if the operation was possible. * Returns 1 if the operation is impossible, the caller must sleep. - * Negative values are error codes. + * Returns <0 for error codes. */ -static int perform_atomic_semop(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q) +static int perform_atomic_semop_slow(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q) { int result, sem_op, nsops, pid; struct sembuf *sop; @@ -666,6 +675,72 @@ static int perform_atomic_semop(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q) return result; } +static int perform_atomic_semop(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q) +{ + int result, sem_op, nsops; + struct sembuf *sop; + struct sem *curr; + struct sembuf *sops; + struct sem_undo *un; + + sops = q->sops; + nsops = q->nsops; + un = q->undo; + + if (unlikely(q->dupsop)) + return perform_atomic_semop_slow(sma, q); + + /* + * We scan the semaphore set twice, first to ensure that the entire + * operation can succeed, therefore avoiding any pointless writes + * to shared memory and having to undo such changes in order to block + * until the operations can go through. + */ + for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) { + curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num; + sem_op = sop->sem_op; + result = curr->semval; + + if (!sem_op && result) + goto would_block; /* wait-for-zero */ + + result += sem_op; + if (result < 0) + goto would_block; + + if (result > SEMVMX) + return -ERANGE; + + if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) { + int undo = un->semadj[sop->sem_num] - sem_op; + + /* Exceeding the undo range is an error. */ + if (undo < (-SEMAEM - 1) || undo > SEMAEM) + return -ERANGE; + } + } + + for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) { + curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num; + sem_op = sop->sem_op; + result = curr->semval; + + if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) { + int undo = un->semadj[sop->sem_num] - sem_op; + + un->semadj[sop->sem_num] = undo; + } + curr->semval += sem_op; + curr->sempid = q->pid; + } + + return 0; + +would_block: + q->blocking = sop; + return sop->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT ? -EAGAIN : 1; +} + static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error, struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { @@ -1720,9 +1795,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops, struct sembuf fast_sops[SEMOPM_FAST]; struct sembuf *sops = fast_sops, *sop; struct sem_undo *un; - int undos = 0, alter = 0, max, locknum; + int max, locknum; + bool undos = false, alter = false, dupsop = false; struct sem_queue queue; - unsigned long jiffies_left = 0; + unsigned long dup = 0, jiffies_left = 0; struct ipc_namespace *ns; ns = current->nsproxy->ipc_ns; @@ -1736,10 +1812,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops, if (sops == NULL) return -ENOMEM; } + if (copy_from_user(sops, tsops, nsops * sizeof(*tsops))) { error = -EFAULT; goto out_free; } + if (timeout) { struct timespec _timeout; if (copy_from_user(&_timeout, timeout, sizeof(*timeout))) { @@ -1753,17 +1831,30 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops, } jiffies_left = timespec_to_jiffies(&_timeout); } + max = 0; for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) { + unsigned long mask = 1ULL << ((sop->sem_num) % BITS_PER_LONG); + if (sop->sem_num >= max) max = sop->sem_num; if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) - undos = 1; - if (sop->sem_op != 0) - alter = 1; + undos = true; + if (dup & mask) { + /* + * There was a previous alter access that appears + * to have accessed the same semaphore, thus use + * the dupsop logic. "appears", because the detection + * can only check % BITS_PER_LONG. + */ + dupsop = true; + } + if (sop->sem_op != 0) { + alter = true; + dup |= mask; + } } - if (undos) { /* On success, find_alloc_undo takes the rcu_read_lock */ un = find_alloc_undo(ns, semid); @@ -1828,6 +1919,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops, queue.undo = un; queue.pid = task_tgid_vnr(current); queue.alter = alter; + queue.dupsop = dupsop; error = perform_atomic_semop(sma, &queue); if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking succesfull path */