提交 44c9f2f2 编写于 作者: I Ido Schimmel 提交者: David S. Miller

ipv6: Check nexthop flags in route dump instead of carrier

Similar to previous patch, there is no need to check for the carrier of
the nexthop device when dumping the route and we can instead check for
the presence of the RTNH_F_LINKDOWN flag.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 14c5206c
...@@ -4039,7 +4039,7 @@ static size_t rt6_nlmsg_size(struct rt6_info *rt) ...@@ -4039,7 +4039,7 @@ static size_t rt6_nlmsg_size(struct rt6_info *rt)
static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt, static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt,
unsigned int *flags, bool skip_oif) unsigned int *flags, bool skip_oif)
{ {
if (!netif_running(rt->dst.dev) || !netif_carrier_ok(rt->dst.dev)) { if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN) {
*flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN; *flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
if (rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.ignore_routes_with_linkdown) if (rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.ignore_routes_with_linkdown)
*flags |= RTNH_F_DEAD; *flags |= RTNH_F_DEAD;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册