From 2e136cd36ede133ee90ff19eeebd5b6027c28d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kajol Jain Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:11:10 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Remove config check to enable bpf support for branch records stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.94 commit 69e402a985418d5fc609730f5f8a81ca514bb823 bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I531X9 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=69e402a985418d5fc609730f5f8a81ca514bb823 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit db52f57211b4e45f0ebb274e2c877b211dc18591 ] Branch data available to BPF programs can be very useful to get stack traces out of userspace application. Commit fff7b64355ea ("bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper") added BPF support to capture branch records in x86. Enable this feature also for other architectures as well by removing checks specific to x86. If an architecture doesn't support branch records, bpf_read_branch_records() still has appropriate checks and it will return an -EINVAL in that scenario. Based on UAPI helper doc in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h, unsupported architectures should return -ENOENT in such case. Hence, update the appropriate check to return -ENOENT instead. Selftest 'perf_branches' result on power9 machine which has the branch stacks support: - Before this patch: [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:FAIL #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK #88 perf_branches:FAIL Summary: 0/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED - After this patch: [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:OK #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK #88 perf_branches:OK Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Selftest 'perf_branches' result on power9 machine which doesn't have branch stack report: - After this patch: [command]# ./test_progs -t perf_branches #88/1 perf_branches/perf_branches_hw:SKIP #88/2 perf_branches/perf_branches_no_hw:OK #88 perf_branches:OK Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Fixes: fff7b64355eac ("bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211206073315.77432-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai Acked-by: Xie XiuQi --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index b838148d73fc..81a7b622c691 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1517,9 +1517,6 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_prog_read_value_proto = { BPF_CALL_4(bpf_read_branch_records, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx, void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags) { -#ifndef CONFIG_X86 - return -ENOENT; -#else static const u32 br_entry_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry); struct perf_branch_stack *br_stack = ctx->data->br_stack; u32 to_copy; @@ -1528,7 +1525,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_read_branch_records, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx, return -EINVAL; if (unlikely(!br_stack)) - return -EINVAL; + return -ENOENT; if (flags & BPF_F_GET_BRANCH_RECORDS_SIZE) return br_stack->nr * br_entry_size; @@ -1540,7 +1537,6 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_read_branch_records, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx, memcpy(buf, br_stack->entries, to_copy); return to_copy; -#endif } static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_read_branch_records_proto = { -- GitLab