From 2b290bbb60847c0897c047b5214192810de529df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Westphal Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 04:48:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor It is identical to the can destructor. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- include/linux/can/skb.h | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/can/skb.h b/include/linux/can/skb.h index cc00d15c6107..b6a52a4b457a 100644 --- a/include/linux/can/skb.h +++ b/include/linux/can/skb.h @@ -44,16 +44,11 @@ static inline void can_skb_reserve(struct sk_buff *skb) skb_reserve(skb, sizeof(struct can_skb_priv)); } -static inline void can_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb) -{ - sock_put(skb->sk); -} - static inline void can_skb_set_owner(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk) { if (sk) { sock_hold(sk); - skb->destructor = can_skb_destructor; + skb->destructor = sock_efree; skb->sk = sk; } } -- GitLab