From 279badc2a85be83e0187b8c566e3b476b76a87a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:55:03 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] openvswitch: conntrack: mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed a "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c index fe861e2f0deb..b27c5c6d9cab 100644 --- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct, } } /* Non-ICMP, fall thru to initialize if needed. */ + /* fall through */ case IP_CT_NEW: /* Seen it before? This can happen for loopback, retrans, * or local packets. -- GitLab