memcg: protect prev_priority

Currently, mem_cgroup doesn't have own lock and almost its member doesn't
need.  (e.g.  mem_cgroup->info is protected by zone lock, mem_cgroup->stat
is per cpu variable)

However, there is one explict exception.  mem_cgroup->prev_priorit need
lock, but doesn't protect.  Luckly, this is NOT bug because prev_priority
isn't used for current reclaim code.

However, we plan to use prev_priority future again.  Therefore, fixing is
better.

In addition, we plan to reuse this lock for another member.  Then
"reclaim_param_lock" name is better than "prev_priority_lock".
Acked-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/memcontrol.c

@@ -144,6 +144,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 	 */
 	struct mem_cgroup_lru_info info;
 
+	/*
+	  protect against reclaim related member.
+	*/
+	spinlock_t reclaim_param_lock;
+
 	int	prev_priority;	/* for recording reclaim priority */
 
 	/*
@@ -400,18 +405,28 @@ int mem_cgroup_calc_mapped_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
  */
 int mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
 {
-	return mem->prev_priority;
+	int prev_priority;
+
+	spin_lock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
+	prev_priority = mem->prev_priority;
+	spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
+
+	return prev_priority;
 }
 
 void mem_cgroup_note_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority)
 {
+	spin_lock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
 	if (priority < mem->prev_priority)
 		mem->prev_priority = priority;
+	spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
 }
 
 void mem_cgroup_record_reclaim_priority(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int priority)
 {
+	spin_lock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
 	mem->prev_priority = priority;
+	spin_unlock(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
 }
 
 int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
@@ -2076,6 +2091,7 @@ mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
 	}
 	mem_cgroup_set_inactive_ratio(mem);
 	mem->last_scanned_child = NULL;
+	spin_lock_init(&mem->reclaim_param_lock);
 
 	return &mem->css;
 free_out: