From 243f2148937adc72bcaaa590d482d599c936efde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 15:33:06 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: send/receive: use explicit unlikely branch instead of implicit coalescing It's very unlikely that send will become true. It's nearly always false between 0 and 120 seconds of a session, and in most cases becomes true only between 120 and 121 seconds before becoming false again. So, unlikely(send) is clearly the right option here. What happened before was that we had this complex boolean expression with multiple likely and unlikely clauses nested. Since this is evaluated left-to-right anyway, the whole thing got converted to unlikely. So, we can clean this up to better represent what's going on. The generated code is the same. Suggested-by: Sultan Alsawaf Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c | 13 ++++++------- drivers/net/wireguard/send.c | 15 ++++++--------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c index 2566e13a292d..3bb5b9ae7cd1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c @@ -226,21 +226,20 @@ void wg_packet_handshake_receive_worker(struct work_struct *work) static void keep_key_fresh(struct wg_peer *peer) { struct noise_keypair *keypair; - bool send = false; + bool send; if (peer->sent_lastminute_handshake) return; rcu_read_lock_bh(); keypair = rcu_dereference_bh(peer->keypairs.current_keypair); - if (likely(keypair && READ_ONCE(keypair->sending.is_valid)) && - keypair->i_am_the_initiator && - unlikely(wg_birthdate_has_expired(keypair->sending.birthdate, - REJECT_AFTER_TIME - KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT - REKEY_TIMEOUT))) - send = true; + send = keypair && READ_ONCE(keypair->sending.is_valid) && + keypair->i_am_the_initiator && + wg_birthdate_has_expired(keypair->sending.birthdate, + REJECT_AFTER_TIME - KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT - REKEY_TIMEOUT); rcu_read_unlock_bh(); - if (send) { + if (unlikely(send)) { peer->sent_lastminute_handshake = true; wg_packet_send_queued_handshake_initiation(peer, false); } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/send.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/send.c index dc3079e17c7f..6687db699803 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/send.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/send.c @@ -124,20 +124,17 @@ void wg_packet_send_handshake_cookie(struct wg_device *wg, static void keep_key_fresh(struct wg_peer *peer) { struct noise_keypair *keypair; - bool send = false; + bool send; rcu_read_lock_bh(); keypair = rcu_dereference_bh(peer->keypairs.current_keypair); - if (likely(keypair && READ_ONCE(keypair->sending.is_valid)) && - (unlikely(atomic64_read(&keypair->sending.counter.counter) > - REKEY_AFTER_MESSAGES) || - (keypair->i_am_the_initiator && - unlikely(wg_birthdate_has_expired(keypair->sending.birthdate, - REKEY_AFTER_TIME))))) - send = true; + send = keypair && READ_ONCE(keypair->sending.is_valid) && + (atomic64_read(&keypair->sending.counter.counter) > REKEY_AFTER_MESSAGES || + (keypair->i_am_the_initiator && + wg_birthdate_has_expired(keypair->sending.birthdate, REKEY_AFTER_TIME))); rcu_read_unlock_bh(); - if (send) + if (unlikely(send)) wg_packet_send_queued_handshake_initiation(peer, false); } -- GitLab