提交 1e05c4d9 编写于 作者: A Alex Deucher

drm/radeon: gcc fixes for ni dpm

Newer versions of gcc seem to wander off into the
weeds when dealing with variable sizes arrays in
structs.  Rather than indexing the arrays, use
pointer arithmetic.

See bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66932
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66972
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66945Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
上级 5e250d20
......@@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ static int ni_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev)
(power_state->v1.ucNonClockStateIndex *
power_info->pplib.ucNonClockSize));
if (power_info->pplib.ucStateEntrySize - 1) {
u8 *idx;
ps = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ni_ps), GFP_KERNEL);
if (ps == NULL) {
kfree(rdev->pm.dpm.ps);
......@@ -4047,12 +4048,12 @@ static int ni_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev)
ni_parse_pplib_non_clock_info(rdev, &rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i],
non_clock_info,
power_info->pplib.ucNonClockSize);
idx = (u8 *)&power_state->v1.ucClockStateIndices[0];
for (j = 0; j < (power_info->pplib.ucStateEntrySize - 1); j++) {
clock_info = (union pplib_clock_info *)
(mode_info->atom_context->bios + data_offset +
le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usClockInfoArrayOffset) +
(power_state->v1.ucClockStateIndices[j] *
power_info->pplib.ucClockInfoSize));
(idx[j] * power_info->pplib.ucClockInfoSize));
ni_parse_pplib_clock_info(rdev,
&rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i], j,
clock_info);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册