提交 18bf3a12 编写于 作者: V Viresh Kumar 提交者: Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: Mark policy->governor = NULL for inactive policies

Later commits would change the way policies are managed today. Policies
wouldn't be freed on cpu hotplug (currently they aren't freed on
suspend), and while the CPU is offline, the sysfs cpufreq files would
still be present.

Because we don't mark policy->governor as NULL, it still contains
pointer of the last used governor. And if the governor is removed, while
all the CPUs of a policy are hotplugged out, this pointer wouldn't be
valid anymore. And if we try to read the 'scaling_governor', etc.  from
sysfs, it will result in kernel OOPs.

To prevent this, mark policy->governor as NULL for all inactive policies
while the governor is removed from kernel.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
上级 4573237b
......@@ -1083,7 +1083,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_restore(unsigned int cpu)
if (likely(policy)) {
/* Policy should be inactive here */
WARN_ON(!policy_is_inactive(policy));
policy->governor = NULL;
}
return policy;
......@@ -2145,9 +2144,11 @@ void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
/* clear last_governor for all inactive policies */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
for_each_inactive_policy(policy) {
if (!strcmp(policy->last_governor, governor->name))
if (!strcmp(policy->last_governor, governor->name)) {
policy->governor = NULL;
strcpy(policy->last_governor, "\0");
}
}
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册