提交 1644ccc8 编写于 作者: A Al Viro

Safer nfsd_cross_mnt()

AFAICS, we have a subtle bug there: if we have crossed mountpoint
*and* it got mount --move'd away, we'll be holding only one
reference to fs containing dentry - exp->ex_path.mnt.  IOW, we
ought to dput() before exp_put().
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
上级 e5d67f07
...@@ -116,10 +116,15 @@ nfsd_cross_mnt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry **dpp, ...@@ -116,10 +116,15 @@ nfsd_cross_mnt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry **dpp,
} }
if ((exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_CROSSMOUNT) || EX_NOHIDE(exp2)) { if ((exp->ex_flags & NFSEXP_CROSSMOUNT) || EX_NOHIDE(exp2)) {
/* successfully crossed mount point */ /* successfully crossed mount point */
exp_put(exp); /*
*expp = exp2; * This is subtle: dentry is *not* under mnt at this point.
* The only reason we are safe is that original mnt is pinned
* down by exp, so we should dput before putting exp.
*/
dput(dentry); dput(dentry);
*dpp = mounts; *dpp = mounts;
exp_put(exp);
*expp = exp2;
} else { } else {
exp_put(exp2); exp_put(exp2);
dput(mounts); dput(mounts);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册