You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
stable inclusion from linux-4.19.113 commit e6d506cd2243aa8f6e19fdb4dc61d85275c2c918 CVE: CVE-2020-14381 -------------------------------- commit 8019ad13 upstream. As reported by Jann, ihold() does not in fact guarantee inode persistence. And instead of making it so, replace the usage of inode pointers with a per boot, machine wide, unique inode identifier. This sequence number is global, but shared (file backed) futexes are rare enough that this should not become a performance issue. Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Conflicts: kernel/futex.c [yyl: adjust context] Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NYang Erkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
eebee2f8