/* * Copyright (c) 2008, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code. * * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that * accompanied this code). * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. * * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any * questions. */ /** * The {@code java.lang.invoke} package contains dynamic language support provided directly by * the Java core class libraries and virtual machine. * *
* Historic Note: In some early versions of Java SE 7, * the name of this package is {@code java.dyn}. *
* Certain types in this package have special relations to dynamic * language support in the virtual machine: *
* Each instance of an {@code invokedynamic} instruction is called a dynamic call site. * Multiple instances of an {@code invokedynamic} instruction can share a single * {@code CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic} entry. * In any case, distinct call sites always have distinct linkage state. *
* A dynamic call site is originally in an unlinked state. In this state, there is * no target method for the call site to invoke. * A dynamic call site is linked by means of a bootstrap method, * as described below. * *
* Historic Note: Some older JVMs may allow the index of a {@code CONSTANT_NameAndType} * instead of a {@code CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic}. In earlier, obsolete versions of this API, the * bootstrap method was specified dynamically, in a per-class basis, during class initialization. * *
* The first index specifies a bootstrap method used by the associated dynamic call sites. * The second index specifies the method name, argument types, and return type of the dynamic call site. * The structure of such an entry is therefore analogous to a {@code CONSTANT_Methodref}, * except that the bootstrap method specifier reference replaces * the {@code CONSTANT_Class} reference of a {@code CONSTANT_Methodref} entry. * *
* The JVM will ensure that on first * execution of an {@code ldc} instruction for this entry, a {@link java.dyn.MethodType MethodType} * will be created which represents the type descriptor. * Any classes mentioned in the {@code MethodType} will be loaded if necessary, * but not initialized. * Access checking and error reporting is performed exactly as it is for * references by {@code ldc} instructions to {@code CONSTANT_Class} constants. * *
* The JVM will ensure that on first execution of an {@code ldc} instruction * for this entry, a {@link java.dyn.MethodHandle MethodHandle} will be created which represents * the field or method reference, according to the specific mode implied by the subtag. *
* As with {@code CONSTANT_Class} and {@code CONSTANT_MethodType} constants, * the {@code Class} or {@code MethodType} object which reifies the field or method's * type is created. Any classes mentioned in this reification will be loaded if necessary, * but not initialized, and access checking and error reporting performed as usual. *
* The method handle itself will have a type and behavior determined by the subtag as follows:
*
*
* Here, the type {@code C} is taken from the {@code CONSTANT_Class} reference associated
* with the {@code CONSTANT_NameAndType} descriptor.
* The field name {@code f} or method name {@code m} is taken from the {@code CONSTANT_NameAndType}
* as is the result type {@code T} and (in the case of a method or constructor) the argument type sequence
* {@code A*}.
*
*
*
* N subtag name member MH type bytecode behavior lookup expression
* 1 REF_getField C.f:T (C)T getfield C.f:T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findGetter findGetter(C.class,"f",T.class)}
* 2 REF_getStatic C.f:T ( )T getstatic C.f:T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findStaticGetter findStaticGetter(C.class,"f",T.class)}
* 3 REF_putField C.f:T (C,T)void putfield C.f:T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findSetter findSetter(C.class,"f",T.class)}
* 4 REF_putStatic C.f:T (T)void putstatic C.f:T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findStaticSetter findStaticSetter(C.class,"f",T.class)}
* 5 REF_invokeVirtual C.m(A*)T (C,A*)T invokevirtual C.m(A*)T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findVirtual findVirtual(C.class,"m",MT)}
* 6 REF_invokeStatic C.m(A*)T (C,A*)T invokestatic C.m(A*)T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findStatic findStatic(C.class,"m",MT)}
* 7 REF_invokeSpecial C.m(A*)T (C,A*)T invokespecial C.m(A*)T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findSpecial findSpecial(C.class,"m",MT,this.class)}
* 8 REF_newInvokeSpecial C.<init>(A*)void (A*)C new C; dup; invokespecial C.<init>(A*)void
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findConstructor findConstructor(C.class,MT)}
* 9 REF_invokeInterface C.m(A*)T (C,A*)T invokeinterface C.m(A*)T
* {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#findVirtual findVirtual(C.class,"m",MT)}
* Each method handle constant has an equivalent instruction sequence called its bytecode behavior. * In general, creating a method handle constant can be done in exactly the same circumstances that * the JVM would successfully resolve the symbolic references in the bytecode behavior. * Also, the type of a method handle constant is such that a valid {@code invokeExact} call * on the method handle has exactly the same JVM stack effects as the bytecode behavior. * Finally, calling a method handle constant on a valid set of arguments has exactly the same effect * and returns the same result (if any) as the corresponding bytecode behavior. *
* Each method handle constant also has an equivalent reflective lookup expression, * which is a query to a method in {@link java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup}. * In the example lookup method expression given in the table above, the name {@code MT} * stands for a {@code MethodType} built from {@code T} and the sequence of argument types {@code A*}. * (Note that the type {@code C} is not prepended to the query type {@code MT} even if the member is non-static.) * In the case of {@code findSpecial}, the name {@code this.class} refers to the class containing * the bytecodes. *
* The special name {@code
* The JVM verifier and linker apply the same access checks and restrictions for these references as for the hypothetical
* bytecode instructions specified in the last column of the table.
* A method handle constant will successfully resolve to a method handle if the symbolic references
* of the corresponding bytecode instruction(s) would also resolve successfully.
* Otherwise, an attempt to resolve the constant will throw equivalent linkage errors.
* In particular, method handles to
* private and protected members can be created in exactly those classes for which the corresponding
* normal accesses are legal.
*
* A constant may refer to a method or constructor with the {@code varargs}
* bit (hexadecimal {@code 0x0080}) set in its modifier bitmask.
* The method handle constant produced for such a method behaves as if
* it were created by {@link java.dyn.MethodHandle#asVarargsCollector asVarargsCollector}.
* In other words, the constant method handle will exhibit variable arity,
* when invoked via {@code invokeGeneric}.
* On the other hand, its behavior with respect to {@code invokeExact} will be the same
* as if the {@code varargs} bit were not set.
*
* Although the {@code CONSTANT_MethodHandle} and {@code CONSTANT_MethodType} constant types
* resolve class names, they do not force class initialization.
* Method handle constants for subtags {@code REF_getStatic}, {@code REF_putStatic}, and {@code REF_invokeStatic}
* may force class initialization on their first invocation, just like the corresponding bytecodes.
*
* The rules of section 5.4.3 of the
* JVM Specification
* apply to the resolution of {@code CONSTANT_MethodType}, {@code CONSTANT_MethodHandle},
* and {@code CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic} constants,
* by the execution of {@code invokedynamic} and {@code ldc} instructions.
* (Roughly speaking, this means that every use of a constant pool entry
* must lead to the same outcome.
* If the resolution succeeds, the same object reference is produced
* by every subsequent execution of the same instruction.
* If the resolution of the constant causes an error to occur,
* the same error will be re-thrown on every subsequent attempt
* to use this particular constant.)
*
* Constants created by the resolution of these constant pool types are not necessarily
* interned. Except for {@code CONSTANT_Class} and {@code CONSTANT_String} entries,
* two distinct constant pool entries might not resolve to the same reference
* even if they contain the same symbolic reference.
*
*
* Each {@code invokedynamic} instruction statically specifies its own
* bootstrap method as a constant pool reference.
* The constant pool reference also specifies the call site's name and type descriptor,
* just like {@code invokevirtual} and the other invoke instructions.
*
* Linking starts with resolving the constant pool entry for the
* bootstrap method, and resolving a {@link java.dyn.MethodType MethodType} object for
* the type descriptor of the dynamic call site.
* This resolution process may trigger class loading.
* It may therefore throw an error if a class fails to load.
* This error becomes the abnormal termination of the dynamic
* call site execution.
* Linkage does not trigger class initialization.
*
* Next, the bootstrap method call is started, with at least four values being stacked:
*
* As long as each bootstrap method can be correctly invoked
* by
* As with any method handle constant, a {@code varargs} modifier bit
* on the bootstrap method is ignored.
*
* Note that the first argument of the bootstrap method cannot be
* a simple {@code Class} reference. (This is a change from earlier
* versions of this specification. If the caller class is needed,
* it is easy to {@linkplain java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup#lookupClass() extract it}
* from the {@code Lookup} object.)
*
* After resolution, the linkage process may fail in a variety of ways.
* All failures are reported by an {@link java.dyn.InvokeDynamicBootstrapError InvokeDynamicBootstrapError},
* which is thrown as the abnormal termination of the dynamic call
* site execution.
* The following circumstances will cause this:
*
* If there are several such threads, the bootstrap method may be
* invoked in several threads concurrently.
* Therefore, bootstrap methods which access global application
* data must take the usual precautions against race conditions.
* In any case, every {@code invokedynamic} instruction is either
* unlinked or linked to a unique {@code CallSite} object.
*
* In an application which requires dynamic call sites with individually
* mutable behaviors, their bootstrap methods should produce distinct
* {@link java.dyn.CallSite CallSite} objects, one for each linkage request.
* Alternatively, an application can link a single {@code CallSite} object
* to several {@code invokedynamic} instructions, in which case
* a change to the target method will become visible at each of
* the instructions.
*
* If several threads simultaneously execute a bootstrap method for a single dynamic
* call site, the JVM must choose one {@code CallSite} object and install it visibly to
* all threads. Any other bootstrap method calls are allowed to complete, but their
* results are ignored, and their dynamic call site invocations proceed with the originally
* chosen target object.
*
*
* Historic Note: Unlike some previous versions of this specification,
* these rules do not enable the JVM to duplicate dynamic call sites,
* or to issue “causeless” bootstrap method calls.
* Every dynamic call site transitions at most once from unlinked to linked,
* just before its first invocation.
*
*
* Each bootstrap method specifier contains an index to a
* {@code CONSTANT_MethodHandle} constant, which is the bootstrap
* method itself.
* This is followed by a count, and then a sequence (perhaps empty) of
* indexes to additional static arguments
* for the bootstrap method.
*
* During class loading, the verifier must check the structure of the
* {@code BootstrapMethods} attribute. In particular, each constant
* pool index must be of the correct type. A bootstrap method index
* must refer to a {@code CONSTANT_MethodHandle} (tag 15).
* Every other index must refer to a valid operand of an
* {@code ldc_w} or {@code ldc2_w} instruction (tag 3..8 or 15..16).
*
*
* Static arguments are used to communicate application-specific meta-data
* to the bootstrap method.
* Drawn from the constant pool, they may include references to classes, method handles,
* strings, or numeric data that may be relevant to the task of linking that particular call site.
*
* Static arguments are specified constant pool indexes stored in the {@code BootstrapMethods} attribute.
* Before the bootstrap method is invoked, each index is used to compute an {@code Object}
* reference to the indexed value in the constant pool.
* The valid constant pool entries are listed in this table:
*
* If a given {@code invokedynamic} instruction specifies no static arguments,
* the instruction's bootstrap method will be invoked on three arguments,
* conveying the instruction's caller class, name, and method type.
* If the {@code invokedynamic} instruction specifies one or more static arguments,
* those values will be passed as additional arguments to the method handle.
* (Note that because there is a limit of 255 arguments to any method,
* at most 252 extra arguments can be supplied.)
* The bootstrap method will be invoked as if by either {@code invokeGeneric}
* or {@code invokeWithArguments}. (There is no way to tell the difference.)
*
* The normal argument conversion rules for {@code invokeGeneric} apply to all stacked arguments.
* For example, if a pushed value is a primitive type, it may be converted to a reference by boxing conversion.
* If the bootstrap method is a variable arity method (its modifier bit {@code 0x0080} is set),
* then some or all of the arguments specified here may be collected into a trailing array parameter.
* (This is not a special rule, but rather a useful consequence of the interaction
* between {@code CONSTANT_MethodHandle} constants, the modifier bit for variable arity methods,
* and the {@code java.dyn.MethodHandle#asVarargsCollector asVarargsCollector} transformation.)
*
* Given these rules, here are examples of legal bootstrap method declarations,
* given various numbers {@code N} of extra arguments.
* The first rows (marked {@code *}) will work for any number of extra arguments.
*
* As noted above, the actual method type of the bootstrap method can vary.
* For example, the fourth argument could be {@code MethodHandle},
* if that is the type of the corresponding constant in
* the {@code CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic} entry.
* In that case, the {@code invokeGeneric} call will pass the extra method handle
* constant as an {@code Object}, but the type matching machinery of {@code invokeGeneric}
* will cast the reference back to {@code MethodHandle} before invoking the bootstrap method.
* (If a string constant were passed instead, by badly generated code, that cast would then fail,
* resulting in an {@code InvokeDynamicBootstrapError}.)
*
* Extra bootstrap method arguments are intended to allow language implementors
* to safely and compactly encode metadata.
* In principle, the name and extra arguments are redundant,
* since each call site could be given its own unique bootstrap method.
* Such a practice is likely to produce large class files and constant pools.
*
* Bootstrap Methods
* Before the JVM can execute a dynamic call site (an {@code invokedynamic} instruction),
* the call site must first be linked.
* Linking is accomplished by calling a bootstrap method
* which is given the static information content of the call site,
* and which must produce a {@link java.dyn.MethodHandle method handle}
* that gives the behavior of the call site.
*
*
* The method handle is then applied to the other values as if by
* {@link java.dyn.MethodHandle#invokeGeneric invokeGeneric}.
* The returned result must be a {@link java.dyn.CallSite CallSite} (or a subclass).
* The type of the call site's target must be exactly equal to the type
* derived from the dynamic call site's type descriptor and passed to
* the bootstrap method.
* The call site then becomes permanently linked to the dynamic call site.
* invokeGeneric
, its detailed type is arbitrary.
* For example, the first argument could be {@code Object}
* instead of {@code MethodHandles.Lookup}, and the return type
* could also be {@code Object} instead of {@code CallSite}.
*
*
*
* timing of linkage
* A dynamic call site is linked just before its first execution.
* The bootstrap method call implementing the linkage occurs within
* a thread that is attempting a first execution.
* the {@code BootstrapMethods} attribute
* Each {@code CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic} entry contains an index which references
* a bootstrap method specifier; all such specifiers are contained in a separate array.
* This array is defined by a class attribute named {@code BootstrapMethods}.
* The body of this attribute consists of a sequence of byte pairs, all interpreted as
* as 16-bit counts or constant pool indexes, in the {@code u2} format.
* The attribute body starts with a count of bootstrap method specifiers,
* which is immediately followed by the sequence of specifiers.
* static arguments to the bootstrap method
* An {@code invokedynamic} instruction specifies at least three arguments
* to pass to its bootstrap method:
* The caller class (expressed as a {@link java.dyn.MethodHandles.Lookup Lookup object},
* the name (extracted from the {@code CONSTANT_NameAndType} entry),
* and the type (also extracted from the {@code CONSTANT_NameAndType} entry).
* The {@code invokedynamic} instruction may specify additional metadata values
* to pass to its bootstrap method.
* Collectively, these values are called static arguments to the
* {@code invokedynamic} instruction, because they are used once at link
* time to determine the instruction's behavior on subsequent sets of
* dynamic arguments.
*
*
*
*
*
* entry type argument type argument value
* CONSTANT_String java.lang.String
the indexed string literal
* CONSTANT_Class java.lang.Class
the indexed class, resolved
* CONSTANT_Integer java.lang.Integer
the indexed int value
* CONSTANT_Long java.lang.Long
the indexed long value
* CONSTANT_Float java.lang.Float
the indexed float value
* CONSTANT_Double java.lang.Double
the indexed double value
* CONSTANT_MethodHandle java.dyn.MethodHandle
the indexed method handle constant
* CONSTANT_MethodType java.dyn.MethodType
the indexed method type constant
*
* The last example assumes that the extra arguments are of type
* {@code CONSTANT_String} and {@code CONSTANT_Integer}, respectively.
* The second-to-last example assumes that all extra arguments are of type
* {@code CONSTANT_String}.
* The other examples work with all types of extra arguments.
*
*
*
* N sample bootstrap method
* * CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, String name, MethodType type, Object... args)
* * CallSite bootstrap(Object... args)
* * CallSite bootstrap(Object caller, Object... nameAndTypeWithArgs)
* 0 CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, String name, MethodType type)
* 0 CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, Object... nameAndType)
* 1 CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, String name, MethodType type, Object arg)
* 2 CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, String name, MethodType type, Object... args)
* 2 CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, String name, MethodType type, String... args)
* 2 CallSite bootstrap(Lookup caller, String name, MethodType type, String x, int y)
Structure Summary
*
*
* @author John Rose, JSR 292 EG
*/
package java.dyn;
// summary of constant and attribute structures
struct CONSTANT_MethodHandle_info {
u1 tag = 15;
u1 reference_kind; // 1..8 (one of REF_invokeVirtual, etc.)
u2 reference_index; // index to CONSTANT_Fieldref or *Methodref
}
struct CONSTANT_MethodType_info {
u1 tag = 16;
u2 descriptor_index; // index to CONSTANT_Utf8, as in NameAndType
}
struct CONSTANT_InvokeDynamic_info {
u1 tag = 18;
u2 bootstrap_method_attr_index; // index into BootstrapMethods_attr
u2 name_and_type_index; // index to CONSTANT_NameAndType, as in Methodref
}
struct BootstrapMethods_attr {
u2 name; // CONSTANT_Utf8 = "BootstrapMethods"
u4 size;
u2 bootstrap_method_count;
struct bootstrap_method_specifier {
u2 bootstrap_method_ref; // index to CONSTANT_MethodHandle
u2 bootstrap_argument_count;
u2 bootstrap_arguments[bootstrap_argument_count]; // constant pool indexes
} bootstrap_methods[bootstrap_method_count];
}
*