提交 524b2dd2 编写于 作者: T tonyp

6909756: G1: guarantee(G1CollectedHeap::heap()->mark_in_progress(),"Precondition.")

Summary: Make sure that two marking cycles do not overlap, i.e., a new one can only start after the concurrent marking thread finishes all its work. In the fix I piggy-back a couple of minor extra fixes: some general code reformatting for consistency (only around the code I modified), the removal of a field (G1CollectorPolicy::_should_initiate_conc_mark) which doesn't seem to be used at all (it's only set but never read), as well as moving the "is GC locker active" test earlier into the G1 pause / Full GC and using a more appropriate method for it.
Reviewed-by: johnc, jmasa, jcoomes, ysr
上级 1bf17034
......@@ -708,7 +708,18 @@ ConcurrentMark::~ConcurrentMark() {
//
void ConcurrentMark::clearNextBitmap() {
guarantee(!G1CollectedHeap::heap()->mark_in_progress(), "Precondition.");
G1CollectedHeap* g1h = G1CollectedHeap::heap();
G1CollectorPolicy* g1p = g1h->g1_policy();
// Make sure that the concurrent mark thread looks to still be in
// the current cycle.
guarantee(cmThread()->during_cycle(), "invariant");
// We are finishing up the current cycle by clearing the next
// marking bitmap and getting it ready for the next cycle. During
// this time no other cycle can start. So, let's make sure that this
// is the case.
guarantee(!g1h->mark_in_progress(), "invariant");
// clear the mark bitmap (no grey objects to start with).
// We need to do this in chunks and offer to yield in between
......@@ -725,7 +736,18 @@ void ConcurrentMark::clearNextBitmap() {
_nextMarkBitMap->clearRange(mr);
cur = next;
do_yield_check();
// Repeat the asserts from above. We'll do them as asserts here to
// minimize their overhead on the product. However, we'll have
// them as guarantees at the beginning / end of the bitmap
// clearing to get some checking in the product.
assert(cmThread()->during_cycle(), "invariant");
assert(!g1h->mark_in_progress(), "invariant");
}
// Repeat the asserts from above.
guarantee(cmThread()->during_cycle(), "invariant");
guarantee(!g1h->mark_in_progress(), "invariant");
}
class NoteStartOfMarkHRClosure: public HeapRegionClosure {
......
......@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ class ConcurrentMarkThread: public ConcurrentGCThread {
private:
ConcurrentMark* _cm;
bool _started;
bool _in_progress;
volatile bool _started;
volatile bool _in_progress;
void sleepBeforeNextCycle();
......@@ -77,6 +77,16 @@ class ConcurrentMarkThread: public ConcurrentGCThread {
void clear_in_progress() { _in_progress = false; }
bool in_progress() { return _in_progress; }
// This flag returns true from the moment a marking cycle is
// initiated (during the initial-mark pause when started() is set)
// to the moment when the cycle completes (just after the next
// marking bitmap has been cleared and in_progress() is
// cleared). While this flag is true we will not start another cycle
// so that cycles do not overlap. We cannot use just in_progress()
// as the CM thread might take some time to wake up before noticing
// that started() is set and set in_progress().
bool during_cycle() { return started() || in_progress(); }
// Yield for GC
void yield();
......
......@@ -902,6 +902,10 @@ public:
void G1CollectedHeap::do_collection(bool full, bool clear_all_soft_refs,
size_t word_size) {
if (GC_locker::check_active_before_gc()) {
return; // GC is disabled (e.g. JNI GetXXXCritical operation)
}
ResourceMark rm;
if (PrintHeapAtGC) {
......@@ -916,10 +920,6 @@ void G1CollectedHeap::do_collection(bool full, bool clear_all_soft_refs,
assert(SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint(), "should be at safepoint");
assert(Thread::current() == VMThread::vm_thread(), "should be in vm thread");
if (GC_locker::is_active()) {
return; // GC is disabled (e.g. JNI GetXXXCritical operation)
}
{
IsGCActiveMark x;
......@@ -2658,6 +2658,10 @@ struct PrepareForRSScanningClosure : public HeapRegionClosure {
void
G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint() {
if (GC_locker::check_active_before_gc()) {
return; // GC is disabled (e.g. JNI GetXXXCritical operation)
}
if (PrintHeapAtGC) {
Universe::print_heap_before_gc();
}
......@@ -2665,6 +2669,11 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint() {
{
ResourceMark rm;
// This call will decide whether this pause is an initial-mark
// pause. If it is, during_initial_mark_pause() will return true
// for the duration of this pause.
g1_policy()->decide_on_conc_mark_initiation();
char verbose_str[128];
sprintf(verbose_str, "GC pause ");
if (g1_policy()->in_young_gc_mode()) {
......@@ -2673,7 +2682,7 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint() {
else
strcat(verbose_str, "(partial)");
}
if (g1_policy()->should_initiate_conc_mark())
if (g1_policy()->during_initial_mark_pause())
strcat(verbose_str, " (initial-mark)");
// if PrintGCDetails is on, we'll print long statistics information
......@@ -2697,10 +2706,6 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint() {
"young list should be well formed");
}
if (GC_locker::is_active()) {
return; // GC is disabled (e.g. JNI GetXXXCritical operation)
}
bool abandoned = false;
{ // Call to jvmpi::post_class_unload_events must occur outside of active GC
IsGCActiveMark x;
......@@ -2756,7 +2761,7 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint() {
_young_list->print();
#endif // SCAN_ONLY_VERBOSE
if (g1_policy()->should_initiate_conc_mark()) {
if (g1_policy()->during_initial_mark_pause()) {
concurrent_mark()->checkpointRootsInitialPre();
}
save_marks();
......@@ -2858,7 +2863,7 @@ G1CollectedHeap::do_collection_pause_at_safepoint() {
}
if (g1_policy()->in_young_gc_mode() &&
g1_policy()->should_initiate_conc_mark()) {
g1_policy()->during_initial_mark_pause()) {
concurrent_mark()->checkpointRootsInitialPost();
set_marking_started();
// CAUTION: after the doConcurrentMark() call below,
......@@ -3977,7 +3982,7 @@ public:
OopsInHeapRegionClosure *scan_perm_cl;
OopsInHeapRegionClosure *scan_so_cl;
if (_g1h->g1_policy()->should_initiate_conc_mark()) {
if (_g1h->g1_policy()->during_initial_mark_pause()) {
scan_root_cl = &scan_mark_root_cl;
scan_perm_cl = &scan_mark_perm_cl;
scan_so_cl = &scan_mark_heap_rs_cl;
......@@ -4140,7 +4145,7 @@ G1CollectedHeap::scan_scan_only_set(OopsInHeapRegionClosure* oc,
FilterAndMarkInHeapRegionAndIntoCSClosure scan_and_mark(this, &boc, concurrent_mark());
OopsInHeapRegionClosure *foc;
if (g1_policy()->should_initiate_conc_mark())
if (g1_policy()->during_initial_mark_pause())
foc = &scan_and_mark;
else
foc = &scan_only;
......
......@@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ G1CollectorPolicy::G1CollectorPolicy() :
// so the hack is to do the cast QQQ FIXME
_pauses_btwn_concurrent_mark((size_t)G1PausesBtwnConcMark),
_n_marks_since_last_pause(0),
_conc_mark_initiated(false),
_should_initiate_conc_mark(false),
_initiate_conc_mark_if_possible(false),
_during_initial_mark_pause(false),
_should_revert_to_full_young_gcs(false),
_last_full_young_gc(false),
......@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::calculate_young_list_target_config(size_t rs_lengths) {
elapsed_time_ms,
calculations,
full_young_gcs() ? "full" : "partial",
should_initiate_conc_mark() ? " i-m" : "",
during_initial_mark_pause() ? " i-m" : "",
_in_marking_window,
_in_marking_window_im);
#endif // TRACE_CALC_YOUNG_CONFIG
......@@ -1040,7 +1040,8 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::record_full_collection_end() {
set_full_young_gcs(true);
_last_full_young_gc = false;
_should_revert_to_full_young_gcs = false;
_should_initiate_conc_mark = false;
clear_initiate_conc_mark_if_possible();
clear_during_initial_mark_pause();
_known_garbage_bytes = 0;
_known_garbage_ratio = 0.0;
_in_marking_window = false;
......@@ -1186,7 +1187,8 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::record_concurrent_mark_init_start() {
void G1CollectorPolicy::record_concurrent_mark_init_end_pre(double
mark_init_elapsed_time_ms) {
_during_marking = true;
_should_initiate_conc_mark = false;
assert(!initiate_conc_mark_if_possible(), "we should have cleared it by now");
clear_during_initial_mark_pause();
_cur_mark_stop_world_time_ms = mark_init_elapsed_time_ms;
}
......@@ -1257,7 +1259,6 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::record_concurrent_mark_cleanup_end_work2() {
}
_n_pauses_at_mark_end = _n_pauses;
_n_marks_since_last_pause++;
_conc_mark_initiated = false;
}
void
......@@ -1453,17 +1454,24 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::record_collection_pause_end(bool abandoned) {
#endif // PRODUCT
if (in_young_gc_mode()) {
last_pause_included_initial_mark = _should_initiate_conc_mark;
last_pause_included_initial_mark = during_initial_mark_pause();
if (last_pause_included_initial_mark)
record_concurrent_mark_init_end_pre(0.0);
size_t min_used_targ =
(_g1->capacity() / 100) * InitiatingHeapOccupancyPercent;
if (cur_used_bytes > min_used_targ) {
if (cur_used_bytes <= _prev_collection_pause_used_at_end_bytes) {
} else if (!_g1->mark_in_progress() && !_last_full_young_gc) {
_should_initiate_conc_mark = true;
if (!_g1->mark_in_progress() && !_last_full_young_gc) {
assert(!last_pause_included_initial_mark, "invariant");
if (cur_used_bytes > min_used_targ &&
cur_used_bytes > _prev_collection_pause_used_at_end_bytes) {
assert(!during_initial_mark_pause(), "we should not see this here");
// Note: this might have already been set, if during the last
// pause we decided to start a cycle but at the beginning of
// this pause we decided to postpone it. That's OK.
set_initiate_conc_mark_if_possible();
}
}
......@@ -1754,7 +1762,7 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::record_collection_pause_end(bool abandoned) {
bool new_in_marking_window = _in_marking_window;
bool new_in_marking_window_im = false;
if (_should_initiate_conc_mark) {
if (during_initial_mark_pause()) {
new_in_marking_window = true;
new_in_marking_window_im = true;
}
......@@ -2173,7 +2181,13 @@ void G1CollectorPolicy::check_if_region_is_too_expensive(double
if (predicted_time_ms > _expensive_region_limit_ms) {
if (!in_young_gc_mode()) {
set_full_young_gcs(true);
_should_initiate_conc_mark = true;
// We might want to do something different here. However,
// right now we don't support the non-generational G1 mode
// (and in fact we are planning to remove the associated code,
// see CR 6814390). So, let's leave it as is and this will be
// removed some time in the future
ShouldNotReachHere();
set_during_initial_mark_pause();
} else
// no point in doing another partial one
_should_revert_to_full_young_gcs = true;
......@@ -2696,6 +2710,50 @@ bool G1CollectorPolicy_BestRegionsFirst::assertMarkedBytesDataOK() {
}
#endif
void
G1CollectorPolicy::decide_on_conc_mark_initiation() {
// We are about to decide on whether this pause will be an
// initial-mark pause.
// First, during_initial_mark_pause() should not be already set. We
// will set it here if we have to. However, it should be cleared by
// the end of the pause (it's only set for the duration of an
// initial-mark pause).
assert(!during_initial_mark_pause(), "pre-condition");
if (initiate_conc_mark_if_possible()) {
// We had noticed on a previous pause that the heap occupancy has
// gone over the initiating threshold and we should start a
// concurrent marking cycle. So we might initiate one.
bool during_cycle = _g1->concurrent_mark()->cmThread()->during_cycle();
if (!during_cycle) {
// The concurrent marking thread is not "during a cycle", i.e.,
// it has completed the last one. So we can go ahead and
// initiate a new cycle.
set_during_initial_mark_pause();
// And we can now clear initiate_conc_mark_if_possible() as
// we've already acted on it.
clear_initiate_conc_mark_if_possible();
} else {
// The concurrent marking thread is still finishing up the
// previous cycle. If we start one right now the two cycles
// overlap. In particular, the concurrent marking thread might
// be in the process of clearing the next marking bitmap (which
// we will use for the next cycle if we start one). Starting a
// cycle now will be bad given that parts of the marking
// information might get cleared by the marking thread. And we
// cannot wait for the marking thread to finish the cycle as it
// periodically yields while clearing the next marking bitmap
// and, if it's in a yield point, it's waiting for us to
// finish. So, at this point we will not start a cycle and we'll
// let the concurrent marking thread complete the last one.
}
}
}
void
G1CollectorPolicy_BestRegionsFirst::
record_collection_pause_start(double start_time_sec, size_t start_used) {
......
......@@ -724,11 +724,31 @@ protected:
size_t _n_marks_since_last_pause;
// True iff CM has been initiated.
bool _conc_mark_initiated;
// At the end of a pause we check the heap occupancy and we decide
// whether we will start a marking cycle during the next pause. If
// we decide that we want to do that, we will set this parameter to
// true. So, this parameter will stay true between the end of a
// pause and the beginning of a subsequent pause (not necessarily
// the next one, see the comments on the next field) when we decide
// that we will indeed start a marking cycle and do the initial-mark
// work.
volatile bool _initiate_conc_mark_if_possible;
// If initiate_conc_mark_if_possible() is set at the beginning of a
// pause, it is a suggestion that the pause should start a marking
// cycle by doing the initial-mark work. However, it is possible
// that the concurrent marking thread is still finishing up the
// previous marking cycle (e.g., clearing the next marking
// bitmap). If that is the case we cannot start a new cycle and
// we'll have to wait for the concurrent marking thread to finish
// what it is doing. In this case we will postpone the marking cycle
// initiation decision for the next pause. When we eventually decide
// to start a cycle, we will set _during_initial_mark_pause which
// will stay true until the end of the initial-mark pause and it's
// the condition that indicates that a pause is doing the
// initial-mark work.
volatile bool _during_initial_mark_pause;
// True iff CM should be initiated
bool _should_initiate_conc_mark;
bool _should_revert_to_full_young_gcs;
bool _last_full_young_gc;
......@@ -981,9 +1001,21 @@ public:
// Add "hr" to the CS.
void add_to_collection_set(HeapRegion* hr);
bool should_initiate_conc_mark() { return _should_initiate_conc_mark; }
void set_should_initiate_conc_mark() { _should_initiate_conc_mark = true; }
void unset_should_initiate_conc_mark(){ _should_initiate_conc_mark = false; }
bool initiate_conc_mark_if_possible() { return _initiate_conc_mark_if_possible; }
void set_initiate_conc_mark_if_possible() { _initiate_conc_mark_if_possible = true; }
void clear_initiate_conc_mark_if_possible() { _initiate_conc_mark_if_possible = false; }
bool during_initial_mark_pause() { return _during_initial_mark_pause; }
void set_during_initial_mark_pause() { _during_initial_mark_pause = true; }
void clear_during_initial_mark_pause(){ _during_initial_mark_pause = false; }
// This is called at the very beginning of an evacuation pause (it
// has to be the first thing that the pause does). If
// initiate_conc_mark_if_possible() is true, and the concurrent
// marking thread has completed its work during the previous cycle,
// it will set during_initial_mark_pause() to so that the pause does
// the initial-mark work and start a marking cycle.
void decide_on_conc_mark_initiation();
// If an expansion would be appropriate, because recent GC overhead had
// exceeded the desired limit, return an amount to expand by.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册