- 28 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Deepak S 提交于
Added power well arguments to all the force wake routines to help us individually control power well based on the scenario. Signed-off-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> [danvet: Resolve conflict with the removed forcewake hack and drop one spurious hunk Jesse noticed.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 11月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Add a debugfs entry showing the use-count for all power domains of each power well. v3: address comments from Paulo: - simplify power_domain_str() by using a switch table - move power_well::domain_count to power_domains - WARN_ON decrementing a 0 refcount Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
So far we distinguished platforms without a dynamic power well with the HAS_POWER_WELL macro and for such platforms we didn't call any power domain functions. Instead of doing this check we can add an always-on power well for these platforms and call the power domain functions unconditionally. For always-on power wells we only increase/decrease their refcounts, otherwise they are nop. This makes high level driver code more readable and as a bonus provides some idea of the current power domains state for all platforms (once the relevant debugfs entry is added). v3: rename intel_power_wells to i9xx_always_on_power_well (Paulo) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Instead of using a separate function to check whether a power domain is is always on, add an always-on power well covering all these power domains and do the usual get/put on these unconditionally. Since we don't assign a .set handler for these the get/put won't have any effect besides the adjusted refcount. This makes the code more readable and provides debug info also on the use of always-on power wells (once the relevant debugfs entry is added.) v3: make is_always_on to be bool instead of a bit field (Paulo) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
HW generations so far had only one always-on power well and optionally one dynamic power well. Upcoming HW gens may have multiple dynamic power wells, so add some infrastructure to support them. The idea is to keep the existing power domain API used by the rest of the driver and create a mapping between these power domains and the underlying power wells. This mapping can differ from one HW to another but high level driver code doesn't need to know about this. Through the existing get/put API it would just ask for a given power domain and the power domain framework would make sure the relevant power wells get enabled in the right order. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
This way the code is simpler and can also be used for other platforms where the audio power domain->power well mapping is different. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 25 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
SNB has another register where the actual FBC CPU fence number is stored. The documenation explicitly states that the fence number in DPFC_CTL must be 0 on SNB. And in fact when it's not zero, the GTT tracking simply doesn't work. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
All the other .enable_fbc() funcs use plane_name(). Make gen7_enable_fbc() do the same. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The pipe B and pipe C interrupt mask and enable registers are now part of the pipe, so disabling the pipe power wells will lost the contests of the registers. Art totally debugged this one! v2: Use the irq_lock to clarify code, and prevent future bugs (Daniel) Cc: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Make sparse happy.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 09 11月, 2013 13 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Implement WaSingleSubspanDispatchOnAALinesAndPoints BDW-A workaround. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Hold vertex data in cache until last reference BDW-A workaround Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
BDW-A workaround BDW Bug #1899155 Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
BDW-A workaround. BDW Bug #1899812 Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
BDW-A workaround BDW Bug #1899532 v2: WARN on when not using preliminary HW support Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuosugeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuosugeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
This implements a workaround for PSR dealing with some vblank issue. WaPsrDPAMaskVBlankInSRD && WaPsrDPRSUnmaskVBlankInSRD v2: forgot to git add bogus whitespace fix v3: Update with workaround names. Use for_each_pipe() and CHICKEN_PIPESL_1(pipe) macro (Ville) Cc: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuosugeek.org> [danvet: Kill redundant IS_BDW check and remove the copious amount of uneeded lines added.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
This is mostly what we have for HSW with the exceptions of: no writes: GEN6_RC1_WAKE_RATE_LIMIT GEN6_RC6pp_WAKE_RATE_LIMIT GEN6_RC1e_THRESHOLD GEN6_RC6p_THRESHOLD GEN6_RC6pp_THRESHOLD GEN6_RP_DOWN_TIMEOUT - use 1s instead of 1.28s Don't try to overclock, or program ring/IA frequency tables since we don't quite have sufficient docs yet. NOTE: These values do not reflect the changes made recently by Chris. Since we have no evidence yet what the proper way to tweak for this platform is, I think it is good to go, and can be optimized by Chris, or whomever, later. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Drop spurious hunk and drop TODO - having per-platform rps register frobbing code is in my opinion preferred, now that all the infrastructure functions are extracted.] Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuosugeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The current formula we use for HSW is not what is in current docs. However, changing to the HSW formula on my HSW does not improve power usage, and decreases performance by about 5% in limited xonotic testing. For gen8, until we know otherwise, or run experiments, let's use the HSW formula - which should be the same used in the Windows driver (and thus help make an apples-applies comparison) on gen8. v2: Use >= 8 instead of > 7 to be consistent with all other gen checks. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Broadwell has bigger display FIFOs than Haswell. Otherwise the two are very similar. v2: Fix FBC WM_LP shift for BDW v3: Rebase on top of the big Haswell wm rework. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v2) Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
GEN8 also needs this workaround. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Add a generic comment that we need to recheck all these w/a.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Just like Haswell, but with the small twist that the panel fitter for pipe A is now also in the always-on power well. v2: Use the new HAS_POWER_WELL macro. v3: Rebase on top of intel_using_power_well patches. v4: This time actually update the PFIT check correctly so that the pipe A pfit is in the always-on domain. v5: Rebase on top of the VGA power domain addition. v6: Rebase on top of the new power domain infrastructure. Also pimp the commit message a bit while at it. v7: Use IS_BROADWELL instead of IS_GEN8 (Ville). Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> (v1) Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Clock gating init is really a catch all function for registers we need to write early in loading the driver. Atm just the bare metal stuff we need, more will surely come. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 08 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Polling to make sure the current GPU frequency matches the last requested frequency should not be necessay, and if there's some throttling involved, the two might not match anyway. Since we're still seeing this trigger occasionally, and it just introduces a rather pointless 10 ms delay, it seems like better to kill it off. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The RPS register writing routines use the current value of min/max to set certain limits and interrupt gating. If we set those afterwards, we risk setting up the hw incorrectly and losing power management events, and worse, trigger some internal assertions. Reorder the calling sequences to be correct, and remove the then unrequired clamping from inside set_rps(). And for a bonus, fix the bug of calling gen6_set_rps() from Valleyview. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 07 11月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chon Ming Lee 提交于
For DDR data rate reporting by Punit in PUNIT_GPU_FREQ_STS, the actual data encoding is 00b=800, 01b=1066, 10b=1333, 11b=1333. Some premium VLV sku will get the DDR_DATA_RATE set as 11. As a result, the turbo frequency reporting will be incorrect without this workaround. Signed-off-by: NChon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We'll be looking at more than just mem_freq from dev_priv, so just pass the whole thing. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We're currently miscalculating the VLV graphics clock a little bit. This is caused by rounding the step to integer MHz, which does not match reality. Change the formula to match the GUnit HAS to give more accurate answers. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 06 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
Either the docs were wrong or the values have changed since the old days before we had wheels. Reported-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
We don't want it delayed with the RPS work. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 01 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
In commit 6efdf354 Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Date: Wed Oct 16 17:25:52 2013 +0300 the check for i915_disable_power_well flag was removed by overlook, so add it back now. Reported-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 30 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Similarly rename the other related functions in the power domain interface. Higher level driver code calling these functions knows only about power domains, not the underlying power wells which may be different on different platforms. Also these functions really init/cleanup/resume power domains and only through that all related power wells, so rename them accordingly. Note that I left i915_{request,release}_power_well as is, since that really changes the state only of a single power well (and is HSW specific). It should also get a better name once we make it more generic by controlling things through a new audio power domain. v4: - use intel prefix instead of i915 everywhere (Paulo) - use a $prefix_$block_$action format (Daniel) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 28 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
The only real need for this field was in i915_{request,release}_power_well, but there we can get at it by a container_of magic. Also since in the future we'll have multiple power wells each with its own power_well struct it makes sense to remove the field from there where it'd be just redundancy. Suggested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Currently we make sure that all power domains are enabled during driver init and turn off unneded ones only after the first modeset. Similarly during suspend we enable all power domains, which will remain on through the following resume until the first modeset. This logic is supported by intel_set_power_well() in the power domain framework. It would be nice to simplify the API, so that we only have get/put functions and make it more explicit on the higher level how this "power well on during init" logic works. This will make it also easier if in the future we want to shorten the time the power wells are on. For this add a new device private flag tracking whether we have the power wells on because of init/suspend and use only intel_display_power_get()/put(). As nothing else uses intel_set_power_well() we can remove it. This also fixes commit 6efdf354 Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Date: Wed Oct 16 17:25:52 2013 +0300 drm/i915: enable only the needed power domains during modeset where removing intel_set_power_well() resulted in not releasing the reference on the power well that was taken during init and thus leaving the power well on all the time. Regression reported by Paulo. v2: - move the init_power_on flag to the power_domains struct (Daniel) v3: - add note about this being a regression fix too (Paulo) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
In the future we'll need to support multiple power wells, so prepare for that here. Create a new power domains struct which contains all power domain/well specific fields. Since we'll have one lock protecting all power wells, move power_well->lock to the new struct too. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Production HSW does not need it. I confirmed this with Art. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Production IVB does not need it. I confirmed this with Art. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
All our registers which are written through the MCHBAR are defined descriptively as an offset to the MCHBAR. We had 3 outliers here. Convert these as well so all registers which are offsets are MCHBAR can be easily identified/found within the code. With this, convert DCLK to also follow this format. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
There is no hard need for this to be a spin lock, as we don't take these locks in irq context from anywhere. An upcoming patch will add calls to punit read/write functions from within regions protected by this lock and those functions need a mutex in turn. As a solution for that convert the spin lock to be a mutex. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
It is just cleaner this way and makes it easier to add support for other HW generations with always-on power wells powering a different set of domains. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-