1. 28 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 27 11月, 2013 6 次提交
  3. 25 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 14 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 09 11月, 2013 13 次提交
  7. 08 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  8. 07 11月, 2013 3 次提交
  9. 06 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  10. 01 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 30 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: rename i915_init_power_well to init_power_domains_init · ddb642fb
      Imre Deak 提交于
      Similarly rename the other related functions in the power domain
      interface.
      
      Higher level driver code calling these functions knows only about power
      domains, not the underlying power wells which may be different on
      different platforms. Also these functions really init/cleanup/resume
      power domains and only through that all related power wells, so rename
      them accordingly.
      
      Note that I left i915_{request,release}_power_well as is, since that
      really changes the state only of a single power well (and is HSW
      specific). It should also get a better name once we make it more
      generic by controlling things through a new audio power domain.
      
      v4:
      - use intel prefix instead of i915 everywhere (Paulo)
      - use a $prefix_$block_$action format (Daniel)
      Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      ddb642fb
  12. 28 10月, 2013 3 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: remove device field from struct power_well · b4ed4484
      Imre Deak 提交于
      The only real need for this field was in
      i915_{request,release}_power_well, but there we can get at it by a
      container_of magic. Also since in the future we'll have multiple power
      wells each with its own power_well struct it makes sense to remove the
      field from there where it'd be just redundancy.
      Suggested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b4ed4484
    • I
      drm/i915: use power get/put instead of set for power on after init · baa70707
      Imre Deak 提交于
      Currently we make sure that all power domains are enabled during driver
      init and turn off unneded ones only after the first modeset. Similarly
      during suspend we enable all power domains, which will remain on through
      the following resume until the first modeset.
      
      This logic is supported by intel_set_power_well() in the power domain
      framework. It would be nice to simplify the API, so that we only have
      get/put functions and make it more explicit on the higher level how this
      "power well on during init" logic works. This will make it also easier
      if in the future we want to shorten the time the power wells are on.
      
      For this add a new device private flag tracking whether we have the
      power wells on because of init/suspend and use only
      intel_display_power_get()/put(). As nothing else uses
      intel_set_power_well() we can remove it.
      
      This also fixes
      
      commit 6efdf354
      Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Date:   Wed Oct 16 17:25:52 2013 +0300
      
          drm/i915: enable only the needed power domains during modeset
      
      where removing intel_set_power_well() resulted in not releasing the
      reference on the power well that was taken during init and thus leaving
      the power well on all the time. Regression reported by Paulo.
      
      v2:
      - move the init_power_on flag to the power_domains struct (Daniel)
      
      v3:
      - add note about this being a regression fix too (Paulo)
      Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      baa70707
    • I
      drm/i915: prepare for multiple power wells · 83c00f55
      Imre Deak 提交于
      In the future we'll need to support multiple power wells, so prepare for
      that here. Create a new power domains struct which contains all
      power domain/well specific fields. Since we'll have one lock protecting
      all power wells, move power_well->lock to the new struct too.
      
      No functional change.
      Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      83c00f55
  13. 27 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  14. 22 10月, 2013 2 次提交