1. 17 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  2. 03 2月, 2007 4 次提交
  3. 23 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • I
      [PATCH] sched: fix bad missed wakeups in the i386, x86_64, ia64, ACPI and APM idle code · 0888f06a
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Fernando Lopez-Lezcano reported frequent scheduling latencies and audio
      xruns starting at the 2.6.18-rt kernel, and those problems persisted all
      until current -rt kernels. The latencies were serious and unjustified by
      system load, often in the milliseconds range.
      
      After a patient and heroic multi-month effort of Fernando, where he
      tested dozens of kernels, tried various configs, boot options,
      test-patches of mine and provided latency traces of those incidents, the
      following 'smoking gun' trace was captured by him:
      
                       _------=> CPU#
                      / _-----=> irqs-off
                     | / _----=> need-resched
                     || / _---=> hardirq/softirq
                     ||| / _--=> preempt-depth
                     |||| /
                     |||||     delay
         cmd     pid ||||| time  |   caller
            \   /    |||||   \   |   /
        IRQ_19-1479  1D..1    0us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup (try_to_wake_up)
        IRQ_19-1479  1D..1    0us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup <<...>-5856> (37 0)
        IRQ_19-1479  1D..1    0us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup (c01262ba 0 0)
        IRQ_19-1479  1D..1    0us : resched_task (try_to_wake_up)
        IRQ_19-1479  1D..1    0us : __spin_unlock_irqrestore (try_to_wake_up)
        ...
        <idle>-0     1...1   11us!: default_idle (cpu_idle)
        ...
        <idle>-0     0Dn.1  602us : smp_apic_timer_interrupt (c0103baf 1 0)
        ...
         <...>-5856  0D..2  618us : __switch_to (__schedule)
         <...>-5856  0D..2  618us : __schedule <<idle>-0> (20 162)
         <...>-5856  0D..2  619us : __spin_unlock_irq (__schedule)
         <...>-5856  0...1  619us : trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule)
         <...>-5856  0D..1  619us : trace_stop_sched_switched <<...>-5856> (37 0)
      
      what is visible in this trace is that CPU#1 ran try_to_wake_up() for
      PID:5856, it placed PID:5856 on CPU#0's runqueue and ran resched_task()
      for CPU#0. But it decided to not send an IPI that no CPU - due to
      TS_POLLING. But CPU#0 never woke up after its NEED_RESCHED bit was set,
      and only rescheduled to PID:5856 upon the next lapic timer IRQ. The
      result was a 600+ usecs latency and a missed wakeup!
      
      the bug turned out to be an idle-wakeup bug introduced into the mainline
      kernel this summer via an optimization in the x86_64 tree:
      
          commit 495ab9c0
          Author: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
          Date:   Mon Jun 26 13:59:11 2006 +0200
      
          [PATCH] i386/x86-64/ia64: Move polling flag into thread_info_status
      
          During some profiling I noticed that default_idle causes a lot of
          memory traffic. I think that is caused by the atomic operations
          to clear/set the polling flag in thread_info. There is actually
          no reason to make this atomic - only the idle thread does it
          to itself, other CPUs only read it. So I moved it into ti->status.
      
      the problem is this type of change:
      
              if (!hlt_counter && boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok) {
      -               clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
      +               current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
                      smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
                      while (!need_resched()) {
                              local_irq_disable();
      
      this changes clear_thread_flag() to an explicit clearing of TS_POLLING.
      clear_thread_flag() is defined as:
      
              clear_bit(flag, &ti->flags);
      
      and clear_bit() is a LOCK-ed atomic instruction on all x86 platforms:
      
        static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long * addr)
        {
                __asm__ __volatile__( LOCK_PREFIX
                        "btrl %1,%0"
      
      hence smp_mb__after_clear_bit() is defined as a simple compile barrier:
      
        #define smp_mb__after_clear_bit()       barrier()
      
      but the explicit TS_POLLING clearing introduced by the patch:
      
      +               current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
      
      is not an atomic op! So the clearing of the TS_POLLING bit is freely
      reorderable with the reading of the NEED_RESCHED bit - and both now
      reside in different memory addresses.
      
      CPU idle wakeup very much depends on ordered memory ops, the clearing of
      the TS_POLLING flag must always be done before we test need_resched()
      and hit the idle instruction(s). [Symmetrically, the wakeup code needs
      to set NEED_RESCHED before it tests the TS_POLLING flag, so memory
      ordering is paramount.]
      
      Fernando's dual-core Athlon64 system has a sufficiently advanced memory
      ordering model so that it triggered this scenario very often.
      
      ( And it also turned out that the reason why these latencies never
        triggered on my testsystems is that i routinely use idle=poll, which
        was the only idle variant not affected by this bug. )
      
      The fix is to change the smp_mb__after_clear_bit() to an smp_mb(), to
      act as an absolute barrier between the TS_POLLING write and the
      NEED_RESCHED read. This affects almost all idling methods (default,
      ACPI, APM), on all 3 x86 architectures: i386, x86_64, ia64.
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Tested-by: NFernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      0888f06a
  4. 21 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 17 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 14 10月, 2006 3 次提交
  7. 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure · 5c87579e
      Arjan van de Ven 提交于
      Add infrastructure to track "maximum allowable latency" for power saving
      policies.
      
      The reason for adding this infrastructure is that power management in the
      idle loop needs to make a tradeoff between latency and power savings
      (deeper power save modes have a longer latency to running code again).  The
      code that today makes this tradeoff just does a rather simple algorithm;
      however this is not good enough: There are devices and use cases where a
      lower latency is required than that the higher power saving states provide.
       An example would be audio playback, but another example is the ipw2100
      wireless driver that right now has a very direct and ugly acpi hook to
      disable some higher power states randomly when it gets certain types of
      error.
      
      The proposed solution is to have an interface where drivers can
      
      * announce the maximum latency (in microseconds) that they can deal with
      * modify this latency
      * give up their constraint
      
      and a function where the code that decides on power saving strategy can
      query the current global desired maximum.
      
      This patch has a user of each side: on the consumer side, ACPI is patched
      to use this, on the producer side the ipw2100 driver is patched.
      
      A generic maximum latency is also registered of 2 timer ticks (more and you
      lose accurate time tracking after all).
      
      While the existing users of the patch are x86 specific, the infrastructure
      is not.  I'd like to ask the arch maintainers of other architectures if the
      infrastructure is generic enough for their use (assuming the architecture
      has such a tradeoff as concept at all), and the sound/multimedia driver
      owners to look at the driver facing API to see if this is something they
      can use.
      
      [akpm@osdl.org: cleanups]
      Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
      Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5c87579e
  8. 10 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 30 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 28 6月, 2006 5 次提交
  11. 27 6月, 2006 5 次提交
  12. 14 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2006 2 次提交
  14. 05 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  15. 12 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  16. 07 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 06 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  18. 03 12月, 2005 2 次提交
  19. 02 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  20. 01 12月, 2005 1 次提交
  21. 30 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  22. 18 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  23. 09 11月, 2005 1 次提交
    • N
      [PATCH] sched: resched and cpu_idle rework · 64c7c8f8
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Make some changes to the NEED_RESCHED and POLLING_NRFLAG to reduce
      confusion, and make their semantics rigid.  Improves efficiency of
      resched_task and some cpu_idle routines.
      
      * In resched_task:
      - TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only cleared with the task's runqueue lock held,
        and as we hold it during resched_task, then there is no need for an
        atomic test and set there. The only other time this should be set is
        when the task's quantum expires, in the timer interrupt - this is
        protected against because the rq lock is irq-safe.
      
      - If TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set, then we don't need to do anything. It
        won't get unset until the task get's schedule()d off.
      
      - If we are running on the same CPU as the task we resched, then set
        TIF_NEED_RESCHED and no further action is required.
      
      - If we are running on another CPU, and TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is *not* set
        after TIF_NEED_RESCHED has been set, then we need to send an IPI.
      
      Using these rules, we are able to remove the test and set operation in
      resched_task, and make clear the previously vague semantics of
      POLLING_NRFLAG.
      
      * In idle routines:
      - Enter cpu_idle with preempt disabled. When the need_resched() condition
        becomes true, explicitly call schedule(). This makes things a bit clearer
        (IMO), but haven't updated all architectures yet.
      
      - Many do a test and clear of TIF_NEED_RESCHED for some reason. According
        to the resched_task rules, this isn't needed (and actually breaks the
        assumption that TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only cleared with the runqueue lock
        held). So remove that. Generally one less locked memory op when switching
        to the idle thread.
      
      - Many idle routines clear TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG, and only set it in the inner
        most polling idle loops. The above resched_task semantics allow it to be
        set until before the last time need_resched() is checked before going into
        a halt requiring interrupt wakeup.
      
        Many idle routines simply never enter such a halt, and so POLLING_NRFLAG
        can be always left set, completely eliminating resched IPIs when rescheduling
        the idle task.
      
        POLLING_NRFLAG width can be increased, to reduce the chance of resched IPIs.
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      64c7c8f8