Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 153
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 20 4月, 2019 2 次提交
  3. 09 8月, 2018 1 次提交
    • M
      ACPI / EC: Add another entry for Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th · 4c3be61e
      由 Mika Westerberg 提交于 
      Commit 2c4d6baf (ACPI / EC: Use ec_no_wakeup on more Thinkpad X1
Carbon 6th systems) changed the DMI table to match all systems where
DMI product family is "Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th". However, the system I
have here has this string written differently (ThinkPad vs. Thinkpad)
which makes the match fail.

In addition to that, after BIOS upgrade Robin now has the same string
than my system has (perhaps newer BIOS has changed the string).

In any case add another DMI entry to acpi_ec_no_wakeup[] table hopefully
covering all the X1 Carbon 6th systems out there.

Fixes: 2c4d6baf (ACPI / EC: Use ec_no_wakeup on more Thinkpad X1 Carbon 6th systems)
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Rebase and change the ident string to match the product familiy ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      4c3be61e
  5. 06 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 19 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 18 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 25 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: EC: Dispatch the EC GPE directly on s2idle wake · 68e22011
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      On platforms where the Low Power S0 Idle _DSM interface is used,
on wakeup from suspend-to-idle, when it is known that the ACPI SCI
has triggered while suspended, dispatch the EC GPE in order to catch
all EC events that may have triggered the wakeup before carrying out
the noirq phase of device resume.

That is needed to handle power button wakeup on some platforms where
the EC goes into a low-power mode during suspend-to-idle and while in
that mode it will discard events after a timeout.  If that timeout is
shorter than the time it takes to complete the noirq resume of
devices, looking for EC events after the latter is too late.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reported-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NWendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
      68e22011
  13. 12 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 04 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 21 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPI / EC: Fix regression related to PM ops support in ECDT device · a64a62ce
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      On platforms (ASUS X550ZE and possibly all ASUS X series) with valid ECDT
EC but invalid DSDT EC, EC PM ops won't be invoked as ECDT EC is not an
ACPI device. Thus the following commit actually removed post-resume
acpi_ec_enable_event() invocation for such platforms, and triggered a
regression on them that after being resumed, EC (actually should be ECDT)
driver stops handling EC events:

 Commit: c2b46d67
 Subject: ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process

Notice that the root cause actually is "ECDT is not an ACPI device" rather
than "the timing of acpi_ec_enable_event() invocation", this patch fixes
this issue by enumerating ECDT EC as an ACPI device. Due to the existence
of the noirq stage, the ability of tuning the timing of
acpi_ec_enable_event() invocation is still meaningful.

This patch is a little bit different from the posted fix by moving
acpi_config_boot_ec() from acpi_ec_ecdt_start() to acpi_ec_add() to make
sure that EC event handling won't be stopped as long as the ACPI EC driver
is bound. Thus the following sequence shouldn't disable EC event handling:
unbind,suspend,resume,bind.

Fixes: c2b46d67 (ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196847Reported-by: NLuya Tshimbalanga <luya@fedoraproject.org>
Tested-by: NLuya Tshimbalanga <luya@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: 4.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.9+
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      a64a62ce
  19. 09 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 31 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • K
      treewide: Fix function prototypes for module_param_call() · e4dca7b7
      由 Kees Cook 提交于 
      Several function prototypes for the set/get functions defined by
module_param_call() have a slightly wrong argument types. This fixes
those in an effort to clean up the calls when running under type-enforced
compiler instrumentation for CFI. This is the result of running the
following semantic patch:

@match_module_param_call_function@
declarer name module_param_call;
identifier _name, _set_func, _get_func;
expression _arg, _mode;
@@

 module_param_call(_name, _set_func, _get_func, _arg, _mode);

@fix_set_prototype
 depends on match_module_param_call_function@
identifier match_module_param_call_function._set_func;
identifier _val, _param;
type _val_type, _param_type;
@@

 int _set_func(
-_val_type _val
+const char * _val
 ,
-_param_type _param
+const struct kernel_param * _param
 ) { ... }

@fix_get_prototype
 depends on match_module_param_call_function@
identifier match_module_param_call_function._get_func;
identifier _val, _param;
type _val_type, _param_type;
@@

 int _get_func(
-_val_type _val
+char * _val
 ,
-_param_type _param
+const struct kernel_param * _param
 ) { ... }

Two additional by-hand changes are included for places where the above
Coccinelle script didn't notice them:

	drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
	fs/lockd/svc.c
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NJessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
      e4dca7b7
  23. 14 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 20 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 18 8月, 2017 2 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: EC: Fix possible issues related to EC initialization order · 69b957c2
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      Use the observation that the EC command/data register addresses are
sufficient to determine if two EC devices are equivelent to modify
acpi_is_boot_ec().

Then, for the removed comparison factors, EC ID and EC GPE, they need
to be synchronized for the boot_ec:

 1. Before registering the BIOS-provided EC event handlers in
    acpi_ec_register_query_methods(), the namespace node holding
    _Qxx methods should be located.  The real namespace PNP0C09
    device location then is apparently more trustworthy than the
    ECDT EC ID.

 2. Because of the ASUS quirks, the ECDT EC GPE is more trustworthy
    than the namespace PNP0C09 device's _GPE setting.

Use the above observations to synchronize the boot_ec settings in
acpi_ec_add().

Finally, change the order of acpi_ec_ecdt_start() and acpi_ec_add(),
called from acpi_bus_register_driver(), so as to follow the fast path
of determining the location of _Qxx.
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
[ rjw : Changelog & comments ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      69b957c2
    • L
      ACPI: EC: Fix regression related to wrong ECDT initialization order · 98529b92
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      Commit 2a570840 (ACPI / EC: Fix a gap that ECDT EC cannot handle
EC events) introduced acpi_ec_ecdt_start(), but that function is
invoked before acpi_ec_query_init(), which is too early.  This causes
the kernel to crash if an EC event occurs after boot, when ec_query_wq
is not valid:

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000102
 ...
 Workqueue: events acpi_ec_event_handler
 task: ffff9f539790dac0 task.stack: ffffb437c0e10000
 RIP: 0010:__queue_work+0x32/0x430

Normally, the DSDT EC should always be valid, so acpi_ec_ecdt_start()
is actually a no-op in the majority of cases.  However, commit
c712bb58 (ACPI / EC: Add support to skip boot stage DSDT probe)
caused the probing of the DSDT EC as the "boot EC" to be skipped when
the ECDT EC is valid and uncovered the bug.

Fix this issue by invoking acpi_ec_ecdt_start() after acpi_ec_query_init()
in acpi_ec_init().

Link: https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/LCK-4348
Fixes: 2a570840 (ACPI / EC: Fix a gap that ECDT EC cannot handle EC events)
Fixes: c712bb58 (ACPI / EC: Add support to skip boot stage DSDT probe)
Reported-by: NWang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NFeng Chenzhou <chenzhoux.feng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      98529b92
  29. 20 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PM / EC: Flush all EC work in acpi_freeze_sync() · 880a6627
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Commit eed4d47e (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from
suspend-to-idle) introduced acpi_freeze_sync() whose purpose is to
flush all of the processing of possible wakeup events signaled via
the ACPI SCI.  However, it doesn't flush the query workqueue used
by the EC driver, so the events generated by the EC may not be
processed timely which leads to issues (increased overhead at least,
lost events possibly).

To fix that introduce acpi_ec_flush_work() that will flush all of
the outstanding EC work and call it from acpi_freeze_sync().

Fixes: eed4d47e (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      880a6627
  31. 19 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / EC: Add parameter to force disable the GPE on suspend · 76380636
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      After commit 8110dd28 (ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from
suspend-to-idle on recent systems) the configuration of GPEs,
including the EC one, is not changed during suspend-to-idle on
recent systems.  That's in order to make system wakeup events
generated by the EC work, in particular.

However, on some of the systems in question (for example on Dell
XPS13 9365), in addition to generating system wakeup events the
EC generates a heartbeat sequence of interrupts that have nothing
to do with wakeup while suspended, and the Low Power Idle S0 _DSM
interface doesn't change that behavior.

The users of those systems may prefer to disable the EC GPE during
system suspend, for the cost of non-functional power button wakeup
or similar, but currently there is no way to do that.

For this reason, add a new module parameter, ec_no_wakeup, for the
EC driver module that, if set, will cause the EC GPE to be disabled
during system suspend and re-enabled during the subsequent system
resume.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192591#c106
Amends: 8110dd28 (ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems)
Reported-and-tested-by: NPatrik Kullman <patrik.kullman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      76380636
  33. 12 7月, 2017 2 次提交
  35. 29 6月, 2017 4 次提交
  37. 28 6月, 2017 2 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: EC: Fix EC command visibility for dynamic debug · 4625d752
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      acpi_ec_cmd_string() currently is only enabled for "DEBUG" macro, but users
trend to use CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG and enable ec.c pr_debug() print-outs by
"dyndbg='file ec.c +p'". In this use case, all command names are turned
into UNDEF and the log is confusing. This affects bugzilla triage work.

This patch fixes this issue by enabling acpi_ec_cmd_string() for
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG.
Tested-by: NWang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NFeng Chenzhou <chenzhoux.feng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      4625d752
    • L
      ACPI: EC: Fix an EC event IRQ storming issue · 1ab69f27
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      The EC event IRQ (SCI_EVT) can only be handled by submitting QR_EC. As the
EC driver handles SCI_EVT in a workqueue, after SCI_EVT is flagged and
before QR_EC is submitted, there is a period risking IRQ storming. EC IRQ
must be masked for this period but linux EC driver never does so.

No end user notices the IRQ storming and no developer fixes this known
issue because:

 1. The EC IRQ is always edge triggered GPE, and
 2. The kernel can execute no-op EC IRQ handler very fast.

For edge-triggered EC GPE platforms, it is only reported of post-resume EC
event lost issues, there won't be an IRQ storming. For level triggered EC
GPE platforms, fortunately the kernel is always fast enough to execute such
a no-op EC IRQ handler so that the IRQ handler won't be accumulated to
starve the task contexts, causing a real IRQ storming.

But the IRQ storming actually can still happen when:

 1. The EC IRQ performs like level triggered GPE, and
 2. The kernel EC debugging log is turned on but the console is slow enough.

There are more and more platforms using EC GPE as wake GPE where the EC GPE
is likely designed as level triggered. Then when EC debugging log is
enabled, the EC IRQ handler is no longer a no-op but dumps IRQ status to
the consoles. If the consoles are slow enough, the EC IRQs can arrive much
faster than executing the handler. Finally the accumulated EC event IRQ
handlers starve the task contexts, causing the IRQ storming to occur, and
the kernel hangs can be observed during boot/resume.

This patch fixes this issue by masking EC IRQ for this period:

 1. Begins when there is an SCI_EVT IRQ pending, and
 2. Ends when there is a QR_EC completed (SCI_EVT acknowledged).
Tested-by: NWang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NFeng Chenzhou <chenzhoux.feng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1ab69f27
  39. 23 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / sleep: EC-based wakeup from suspend-to-idle on recent systems · 8110dd28
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Some recent Dell laptops, including the XPS13 model numbers 9360 and
9365, cannot be woken up from suspend-to-idle by pressing the power
button which is unexpected and makes that feature less usable on
those systems.  Moreover, on the 9365 ACPI S3 (suspend-to-RAM) is
not expected to be used at all (the OS these systems ship with never
exercises the ACPI S3 path in the firmware) and suspend-to-idle is
the only viable system suspend mechanism there.

The reason why the power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle doesn't
work on those systems is because their power button events are
signaled by the EC (Embedded Controller), whose GPE (General Purpose
Event) line is disabled during suspend-to-idle transitions in Linux.
That is done on purpose, because in general the EC tends to be noisy
for various reasons (battery and thermal updates and similar, for
example) and all events signaled by it would kick the CPUs out of
deep idle states while in suspend-to-idle, which effectively might
defeat its purpose.

Of course, on the Dell systems in question the EC GPE must be enabled
during suspend-to-idle transitions for the button press events to
be signaled while suspended at all, but fortunately there is a way
out of this puzzle.

First of all, those systems have the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag set
in their ACPI tables, which means that the OS is expected to prefer
the "low power S0 idle" system state over ACPI S3 on them.  That
causes the most recent versions of other OSes to simply ignore ACPI
S3 on those systems, so it is reasonable to expect that it should not
be necessary to block GPEs during suspend-to-idle on them.

Second, in addition to that, the systems in question provide a special
firmware interface that can be used to indicate to the platform that
the OS is transitioning into a system-wide low-power state in which
certain types of activity are not desirable or that it is leaving
such a state and that (in principle) should allow the platform to
adjust its operation mode accordingly.

That interface is a special _DSM object under a System Power
Management Controller device (PNP0D80).  The expected way to use it
is to invoke function 0 from it on system initialization, functions
3 and 5 during suspend transitions and functions 4 and 6 during
resume transitions (to reverse the actions carried out by the
former).  In particular, function 5 from the "Low-Power S0" device
_DSM is expected to cause the platform to put itself into a low-power
operation mode which should include making the EC less verbose (so to
speak).  Next, on resume, function 6 switches the platform back to
the "working-state" operation mode.

In accordance with the above, modify the ACPI suspend-to-idle code
to look for the "Low-Power S0" _DSM interface on platforms with the
ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag set in the ACPI tables.  If it's there,
use it during suspend-to-idle transitions as prescribed and avoid
changing the GPE configuration in that case.  [That should reflect
what the most recent versions of other OSes do.]

Also modify the ACPI EC driver to make it handle events during
suspend-to-idle in the usual way if the "Low-Power S0" _DSM interface
is going to be used to make the power button events work while
suspended on the Dell machines mentioned above

Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdfSigned-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      8110dd28
  41. 22 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  43. 30 1月, 2017 2 次提交
  45. 10 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  47. 10 9月, 2016 4 次提交
  49. 31 8月, 2016 5 次提交
    • L
      ACPI / EC: Enable event freeze mode to improve event handling for suspend process · d3028305
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      This patch enables the event freeze mode, flushing the EC event handling in
.suspend() callback. This feature is experimental, if it is bisected out to
be the cause of the real issues, please report the issues to the kernel
bugzilla for further root causing and improvement.

This mode eliminates useless _Qxx handling during the power saving
operations, thus can help to tune the power saving operations faster. Tests
show that this mode can efficiently block flooding _Qxx during the suspend
process and tune the speed of the suspend faster.
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTodd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d3028305
    • L
      ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for suspend process · 39a2a2aa
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      In the original EC driver, though the event handling is not explicitly
stopped, the EC driver is actually not able to handle events during the
noirq stage as the EC driver is not prepared to handle the EC events in the
polling mode. So if there is no advance_transaction() triggered, the EC
driver couldn't notice the EC events.
However, do we actually need to handle EC events during suspend/resume
stage? EC events are mostly useless for the suspend/resume period (key
strokes and battery/thermal updates, etc.,), and the useful ones (lid
close, power/sleep button press) should have already been delivered to the
OSPM to trigger the power saving operations.
Thus this patch implements acpi_ec_disable_event() to be a reverse call of
acpi_ec_enable_event(), with which, the EC driver is able to stop handling
the EC events in a position before entering the noirq stage.

Since there are actually 2 choices for us:
1. implement event handling in polling mode;
2. stop event handling before entering noirq stage.
And this patch only implements the second choice using .suspend() callback.
Thus this is experimental (first choice is better? or different hook
position is better?). This patch finally keeps the old behavior by default
and prepares a boot parameter to enable this feature.

The differences of the event handling availability between the old behavior
(this patch is not applied) and the new behavior (this patch is applied)
are as follows:
                        !FreezeEvents   FreezeEvents
before suspend          Y               Y
suspend before EC       Y               Y
suspend after EC        Y               N
suspend_late            Y               N
suspend_noirq           Y (actually N)  N
resume_noirq            Y (actually N)  N
resume_late             Y (actually N)  N
resume before EC        Y (actually N)  N
resume after EC         Y               Y
after resume            Y               Y
Where "actually N" means if there is no EC transactions, the EC driver
is actually not able to notice the pending events.

We can see that FreezeEvents is the only approach now can actually flush
the EC event handling with both query commands and _Qxx evaluations
flushed, other modes can only flush the EC event handling with only query
commands flushed, _Qxx evaluations occurred after stopping the EC driver
may end up failure due to the failure of the EC transaction carried out in
the _Qxx control methods.

We also can see that this feature should be able to trigger some platform
notifications later than resuming other drivers.
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTodd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      39a2a2aa
    • L
      ACPI / EC: Add PM operations to improve event handling for resume process · c2b46d67
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      This patch makes 2 changes:

1. Restore old behavior
Originally, EC driver stops handling both events and transactions in
acpi_ec_block_transactions(), and restarts to handle transactions in
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early(), restarts to handle both events and
transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions().
While currently, EC driver still stops handling both events and
transactions in acpi_ec_block_transactions(), but restarts to handle both
events and transactions in acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early().
This patch tries to restore the old behavior by dropping
__acpi_ec_enable_event() from acpi_unblock_transactions_early().

2. Improve old behavior
However this still cannot fix the real issue as both of the
acpi_ec_unblock_xxx() functions are invoked in the noirq stage. Since the
EC driver actually doesn't implement the event handling in the polling
mode, re-enabling the event handling too early in the noirq stage could
result in the problem that if there is no triggering source causing
advance_transaction() to be invoked, pending SCI_EVT cannot be detected by
the EC driver and _Qxx cannot be triggered.
It actually makes sense to restart the event handling in any point during
resuming after the noirq stage. Just like the boot stage where the event
handling is enabled in .add(), this patch further moves
acpi_ec_enable_event() to .resume(). After doing that, the following 2
functions can be combined:
acpi_ec_unblock_transactions_early()/acpi_ec_unblock_transactions().

The differences of the event handling availability between the old behavior
(this patch isn't applied) and the new behavior (this patch is applied) are
as follows:
                        !Applied        Applied
before suspend          Y               Y
suspend before EC       Y               Y
suspend after EC        Y               Y
suspend_late            Y               Y
suspend_noirq           Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume_noirq            Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume_late             Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume before EC        Y (actually N)  Y (actually N)
resume after EC         Y (actually N)  Y
after resume            Y (actually N)  Y
Where "actually N" means if there is no triggering source, the EC driver
is actually not able to notice the pending SCI_EVT occurred in the noirq
stage. So we can clearly see that this patch has improved the situation.
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTodd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      c2b46d67
    • L
      ACPI / EC: Fix an issue that SCI_EVT cannot be detected after event is enabled · e923e8e7
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      After enabling the EC event handling, Linux is still in the noirq stage, if
there is no triggering source (EC transaction, GPE STS status),
advance_transaction() will not be invoked and SCI_EVT cannot be detected.
This patch adds one more triggering source after enabling the EC event
handling to poll the pending SCI_EVT.

Known issues:
1. Still no SCI_EVT triggering source
   There could still be no SCI_EVT triggering source after handling the
   first SCI_EVT (polled by this patch if any). Because after handling the
   first SCI_EVT, Linux could still be in noirq stage and there could still
   be no further triggering source in this stage. Then the second SCI_EVT
   indicated during this stage still cannot be detected by the EC driver.
   With this improvement applied, it is then possible to move
   acpi_ec_enable_event() out of the noirq stage to fix this issue (if the
   first SCI_EVT is handled out of the noirq stage, the follow-up SCI_EVTs
   should be able to trigger IRQs).
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTodd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      e923e8e7
    • L
      ACPI / EC: Add EC_FLAGS_QUERY_ENABLED to reveal a hidden logic · 750f628b
      由 Lv Zheng 提交于 
      There is a hidden logic in the EC driver:
1. During boot, EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING is responsible for blocking event
   handling;
2. During suspend, EC_FLAGS_STARTED is responsible for blocking event
   handling.
This patch uses a new EC_FLAGS_QUERY_ENABLED flag to make this hidden
logic explicit and have code cleaned up. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Tested-by: NTodd E Brandt <todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      750f628b