From f8801dbcf0914b6a16848d583761112c32cf4d49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:17:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: io_wqe_run_queue() doesn't need to use
 list_empty_careful()

commit 91d666ea43adef57a6cd50c81b9603c545654981 upstream.

We hold the wqe lock at this point (which is also annotated), so there's
no need to use the careful variant of list_empty().

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/io-wq.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index 4228c7967b76..a0e18a633958 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -339,8 +339,7 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
 static inline bool io_wqe_run_queue(struct io_wqe *wqe)
 	__must_hold(wqe->lock)
 {
-	if (!list_empty_careful(&wqe->work_list) &&
-	    !(wqe->flags & IO_WQE_FLAG_STALLED))
+	if (!list_empty(&wqe->work_list) && !(wqe->flags & IO_WQE_FLAG_STALLED))
 		return true;
 	return false;
 }
-- 
GitLab