提交 f869afab 编写于 作者: L Lennert Buytenhek 提交者: Russell King

[ARM] 3616/1: fix timer handler wrap logic for a number of platforms

Patch from Lennert Buytenhek

A couple of platforms aren't using the right comparison type in their
timer interrupt handlers (as we're comparing two wrapping timestamps,
we need a bmi/bpl-type comparison, not an unsigned comparison) -- this
patch fixes them up.
Signed-off-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
上级 84b61f6d
...@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static int ep93xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static int ep93xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
write_seqlock(&xtime_lock); write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
__raw_writel(1, EP93XX_TIMER1_CLEAR); __raw_writel(1, EP93XX_TIMER1_CLEAR);
while (__raw_readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_LOW) - last_jiffy_time while ((signed long)
(__raw_readl(EP93XX_TIMER4_VALUE_LOW) - last_jiffy_time)
>= TIMER4_TICKS_PER_JIFFY) { >= TIMER4_TICKS_PER_JIFFY) {
last_jiffy_time += TIMER4_TICKS_PER_JIFFY; last_jiffy_time += TIMER4_TICKS_PER_JIFFY;
timer_tick(regs); timer_tick(regs);
......
...@@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static int ixp2000_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static int ixp2000_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
/* clear timer 1 */ /* clear timer 1 */
ixp2000_reg_wrb(IXP2000_T1_CLR, 1); ixp2000_reg_wrb(IXP2000_T1_CLR, 1);
while ((next_jiffy_time - *missing_jiffy_timer_csr) > ticks_per_jiffy) { while ((signed long)(next_jiffy_time - *missing_jiffy_timer_csr)
>= ticks_per_jiffy) {
timer_tick(regs); timer_tick(regs);
next_jiffy_time -= ticks_per_jiffy; next_jiffy_time -= ticks_per_jiffy;
} }
......
...@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ void __init ixp23xx_init_irq(void) ...@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ void __init ixp23xx_init_irq(void)
/************************************************************************* /*************************************************************************
* Timer-tick functions for IXP23xx * Timer-tick functions for IXP23xx
*************************************************************************/ *************************************************************************/
#define CLOCK_TICKS_PER_USEC CLOCK_TICK_RATE / (USEC_PER_SEC) #define CLOCK_TICKS_PER_USEC (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / USEC_PER_SEC)
static unsigned long next_jiffy_time; static unsigned long next_jiffy_time;
...@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ ixp23xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ ixp23xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{ {
/* Clear Pending Interrupt by writing '1' to it */ /* Clear Pending Interrupt by writing '1' to it */
*IXP23XX_TIMER_STATUS = IXP23XX_TIMER1_INT_PEND; *IXP23XX_TIMER_STATUS = IXP23XX_TIMER1_INT_PEND;
while ((*IXP23XX_TIMER_CONT - next_jiffy_time) > LATCH) { while ((signed long)(*IXP23XX_TIMER_CONT - next_jiffy_time) >= LATCH) {
timer_tick(regs); timer_tick(regs);
next_jiffy_time += LATCH; next_jiffy_time += LATCH;
} }
......
...@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ixp4xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs ...@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ixp4xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs
/* /*
* Catch up with the real idea of time * Catch up with the real idea of time
*/ */
while ((*IXP4XX_OSTS - last_jiffy_time) > LATCH) { while ((signed long)(*IXP4XX_OSTS - last_jiffy_time) >= LATCH) {
timer_tick(regs); timer_tick(regs);
last_jiffy_time += LATCH; last_jiffy_time += LATCH;
} }
......
...@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_32k_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, ...@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_32k_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id,
now = omap_32k_sync_timer_read(); now = omap_32k_sync_timer_read();
while (now - omap_32k_last_tick >= OMAP_32K_TICKS_PER_HZ) { while ((signed long)(now - omap_32k_last_tick)
>= OMAP_32K_TICKS_PER_HZ) {
omap_32k_last_tick += OMAP_32K_TICKS_PER_HZ; omap_32k_last_tick += OMAP_32K_TICKS_PER_HZ;
timer_tick(regs); timer_tick(regs);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册