fasync: re-organize fasync entry insertion to allow it under a spinlock
You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new "struct fasync_struct". Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock. In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry. That way the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required spinlock. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch] Tested-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录