提交 f50b4076 编写于 作者: D David Vrabel 提交者: David S. Miller

xen-netfront: don't nest queue locks in xennet_connect()

The nesting of the per-queue rx_lock and tx_lock in xennet_connect()
is confusing to both humans and lockdep.  The locking is safe because
this is the only place where the locks are nested in this way but
lockdep still warns.

Instead of adding the missing lockdep annotations, refactor the
locking to avoid the confusing nesting.  This is still safe, because
the xenbus connection state changes are all serialized by the xenwatch
thread.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Reported-by: NSander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 6e08d5e3
......@@ -2046,13 +2046,15 @@ static int xennet_connect(struct net_device *dev)
/* By now, the queue structures have been set up */
for (j = 0; j < num_queues; ++j) {
queue = &np->queues[j];
spin_lock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
/* Step 1: Discard all pending TX packet fragments. */
spin_lock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
xennet_release_tx_bufs(queue);
spin_unlock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
/* Step 2: Rebuild the RX buffer freelist and the RX ring itself. */
spin_lock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
for (requeue_idx = 0, i = 0; i < NET_RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
skb_frag_t *frag;
const struct page *page;
......@@ -2076,6 +2078,8 @@ static int xennet_connect(struct net_device *dev)
}
queue->rx.req_prod_pvt = requeue_idx;
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
}
/*
......@@ -2087,13 +2091,17 @@ static int xennet_connect(struct net_device *dev)
netif_carrier_on(np->netdev);
for (j = 0; j < num_queues; ++j) {
queue = &np->queues[j];
notify_remote_via_irq(queue->tx_irq);
if (queue->tx_irq != queue->rx_irq)
notify_remote_via_irq(queue->rx_irq);
xennet_tx_buf_gc(queue);
xennet_alloc_rx_buffers(queue);
spin_lock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
xennet_tx_buf_gc(queue);
spin_unlock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
xennet_alloc_rx_buffers(queue);
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册