提交 eca37c18 编写于 作者: J Jan Beulich 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] x86_64: Clean up double fault handling

Since a double fault always implies that kernel data structures are
corrupt, this fault should neither be handed to user mode handling,
nor should the handler allow resuming the faulting code stream (since
architecturally this isn't a fault, but an abort).

Note that this slightly depends on the previously submitted patch
adjusting the prototype of notify_die() (a compiler warning will result
without that other patch).

AK: Removed obsolete CONFIG_CHECKING code, added comments
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 6e3f3617
......@@ -489,7 +489,23 @@ DO_ERROR(11, SIGBUS, "segment not present", segment_not_present)
DO_ERROR_INFO(17, SIGBUS, "alignment check", alignment_check, BUS_ADRALN, 0)
DO_ERROR(18, SIGSEGV, "reserved", reserved)
DO_ERROR(12, SIGBUS, "stack segment", stack_segment)
DO_ERROR( 8, SIGSEGV, "double fault", double_fault)
asmlinkage void do_double_fault(struct pt_regs * regs, long error_code)
{
static const char str[] = "double fault";
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
/* Return not checked because double check cannot be ignored */
notify_die(DIE_TRAP, str, regs, error_code, 8, SIGSEGV);
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
tsk->thread.trap_no = 8;
/* This is always a kernel trap and never fixable (and thus must
never return). */
for (;;)
die(str, regs, error_code);
}
asmlinkage void __kprobes do_general_protection(struct pt_regs * regs,
long error_code)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册