提交 ec4d9f62 编写于 作者: H Hugh Dickins 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm: fix invalidate_complete_page2() lock ordering

In fuzzing with trinity, lockdep protested "possible irq lock inversion
dependency detected" when isolate_lru_page() reenabled interrupts while
still holding the supposedly irq-safe tree_lock:

invalidate_inode_pages2
  invalidate_complete_page2
    spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock)
    clear_page_mlock
      isolate_lru_page
        spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock)

isolate_lru_page() is correct to enable interrupts unconditionally:
invalidate_complete_page2() is incorrect to call clear_page_mlock() while
holding tree_lock, which is supposed to nest inside lru_lock.

Both truncate_complete_page() and invalidate_complete_page() call
clear_page_mlock() before taking tree_lock to remove page from radix_tree.
 I guess invalidate_complete_page2() preferred to test PageDirty (again)
under tree_lock before committing to the munlock; but since the page has
already been unmapped, its state is already somewhat inconsistent, and no
worse if clear_page_mlock() moved up.
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Deciphered-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 7ffc0edc
......@@ -394,11 +394,12 @@ invalidate_complete_page2(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
if (page_has_private(page) && !try_to_release_page(page, GFP_KERNEL))
return 0;
clear_page_mlock(page);
spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
if (PageDirty(page))
goto failed;
clear_page_mlock(page);
BUG_ON(page_has_private(page));
__delete_from_page_cache(page);
spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册