提交 d353d758 编写于 作者: D Dave Chinner 提交者: Josef Bacik

writeback: plug writeback at a high level

Doing writeback on lots of little files causes terrible IOPS storms
because of the per-mapping writeback plugging we do. This
essentially causes imeediate dispatch of IO for each mapping,
regardless of the context in which writeback is occurring.

IOWs, running a concurrent write-lots-of-small 4k files using fsmark
on XFS results in a huge number of IOPS being issued for data
writes.  Metadata writes are sorted and plugged at a high level by
XFS, so aggregate nicely into large IOs. However, data writeback IOs
are dispatched in individual 4k IOs, even when the blocks of two
consecutively written files are adjacent.

Test VM: 8p, 8GB RAM, 4xSSD in RAID0, 100TB sparse XFS filesystem,
metadata CRCs enabled.

Kernel: 3.10-rc5 + xfsdev + my 3.11 xfs queue (~70 patches)

Test:

$ ./fs_mark  -D  10000  -S0  -n  10000  -s  4096  -L  120  -d
/mnt/scratch/0  -d  /mnt/scratch/1  -d  /mnt/scratch/2  -d
/mnt/scratch/3  -d  /mnt/scratch/4  -d  /mnt/scratch/5  -d
/mnt/scratch/6  -d  /mnt/scratch/7

Result:

		wall	sys	create rate	Physical write IO
		time	CPU	(avg files/s)	 IOPS	Bandwidth
		-----	-----	------------	------	---------
unpatched	6m56s	15m47s	24,000+/-500	26,000	130MB/s
patched		5m06s	13m28s	32,800+/-600	 1,500	180MB/s
improvement	-26.44%	-14.68%	  +36.67%	-94.23%	+38.46%

If I use zero length files, this workload at about 500 IOPS, so
plugging drops the data IOs from roughly 25,500/s to 1000/s.
3 lines of code, 35% better throughput for 15% less CPU.

The benefits of plugging at this layer are likely to be higher for
spinning media as the IO patterns for this workload are going make a
much bigger difference on high IO latency devices.....
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Tested-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
上级 edf15b4d
...@@ -1439,7 +1439,9 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, ...@@ -1439,7 +1439,9 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
unsigned long start_time = jiffies; unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
long write_chunk; long write_chunk;
long wrote = 0; /* count both pages and inodes */ long wrote = 0; /* count both pages and inodes */
struct blk_plug plug;
blk_start_plug(&plug);
while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) { while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) {
struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev); struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
...@@ -1537,6 +1539,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, ...@@ -1537,6 +1539,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
break; break;
} }
} }
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
return wrote; return wrote;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册