提交 c4ade94f 编写于 作者: L Li, Shaohua 提交者: Jens Axboe

cfq-iosched: removing unnecessary think time checking

Removing think time checking. A high thinktime queue might means the queue
dispatches several requests and then do away. Limitting such queue seems
meaningless. And also this can simplify code. This is suggested by Vivek.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
上级 62a37f6b
...@@ -2417,19 +2417,14 @@ static bool cfq_may_dispatch(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq) ...@@ -2417,19 +2417,14 @@ static bool cfq_may_dispatch(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
return false; return false;
/* /*
* If there is only one sync queue, and its think time is * If there is only one sync queue
* small, we can ignore async queue here and give the sync * we can ignore async queue here and give the sync
* queue no dispatch limit. The reason is a sync queue can * queue no dispatch limit. The reason is a sync queue can
* preempt async queue, limiting the sync queue doesn't make * preempt async queue, limiting the sync queue doesn't make
* sense. This is useful for aiostress test. * sense. This is useful for aiostress test.
*/ */
if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfqd->busy_sync_queues == 1) { if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfqd->busy_sync_queues == 1)
struct cfq_io_context *cic = RQ_CIC(cfqq->next_rq);
if (sample_valid(cic->ttime_samples) &&
cic->ttime_mean < cfqd->cfq_slice_idle)
promote_sync = true; promote_sync = true;
}
/* /*
* We have other queues, don't allow more IO from this one * We have other queues, don't allow more IO from this one
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册