提交 c03775c0 编写于 作者: B Bob Moore 提交者: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPICA: Improve support for 32/64 bit physical addresses in printf().

This change improves the support for physical addresses in printf
debug statements and other output on both 32-bit and 64-bit hosts.
It consistently outputs the appropriate number of bytes for each
host. The %p specifier is unsatisfactory since it does not emit
uniform output on all hosts/clib implementations (on some, leading
zeros are not supported, leading to difficult-to-read output).
Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
上级 b28a960c
......@@ -63,17 +63,21 @@
#define ACPI_SET64(ptr, val) (*ACPI_CAST64 (ptr) = (u64) (val))
/*
* printf() format helpers
* printf() format helpers. These macros are workarounds for the difficulties
* with emitting 64-bit integers and 64-bit pointers with the same code
* for both 32-bit and 64-bit hosts.
*/
/* Split 64-bit integer into two 32-bit values. Use with %8.8X%8.8X */
#define ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(i) ACPI_HIDWORD(i), ACPI_LODWORD(i)
#if ACPI_MACHINE_WIDTH == 64
#define ACPI_FORMAT_NATIVE_UINT(i) ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(i)
#define ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT(i) ACPI_FORMAT_UINT64(i)
#define ACPI_PRINTF_UINT "0x%8.8X%8.8X"
#else
#define ACPI_FORMAT_NATIVE_UINT(i) 0, (i)
#define ACPI_FORMAT_NATIVE_UINT(i) 0, (u32) (i)
#define ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT(i) (u32) (i)
#define ACPI_PRINTF_UINT "0x%8.8X"
#endif
/*
......
......@@ -128,15 +128,17 @@ acpi_tb_print_table_header(acpi_physical_address address,
struct acpi_table_header local_header;
/*
* The reason that the Address is cast to a void pointer is so that we
* can use %p which will work properly on both 32-bit and 64-bit hosts.
* The reason that we use ACPI_PRINTF_UINT and ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT is to
* support both 32-bit and 64-bit hosts/addresses in a consistent manner.
* The %p specifier does not emit uniform output on all hosts. On some,
* leading zeros are not supported.
*/
if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(header->signature, ACPI_SIG_FACS)) {
/* FACS only has signature and length fields */
ACPI_INFO((AE_INFO, "%4.4s %p %06X",
header->signature, ACPI_CAST_PTR(void, address),
ACPI_INFO((AE_INFO, "%-4.4s " ACPI_PRINTF_UINT " %06X",
header->signature, ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT(address),
header->length));
} else if (ACPI_VALIDATE_RSDP_SIG(header->signature)) {
......@@ -147,8 +149,9 @@ acpi_tb_print_table_header(acpi_physical_address address,
header)->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE);
acpi_tb_fix_string(local_header.oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE);
ACPI_INFO((AE_INFO, "RSDP %p %06X (v%.2d %6.6s)",
ACPI_CAST_PTR(void, address),
ACPI_INFO((AE_INFO,
"RSDP " ACPI_PRINTF_UINT " %06X (v%.2d %-6.6s)",
ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT(address),
(ACPI_CAST_PTR(struct acpi_table_rsdp, header)->
revision >
0) ? ACPI_CAST_PTR(struct acpi_table_rsdp,
......@@ -162,8 +165,9 @@ acpi_tb_print_table_header(acpi_physical_address address,
acpi_tb_cleanup_table_header(&local_header, header);
ACPI_INFO((AE_INFO,
"%4.4s %p %06X (v%.2d %6.6s %8.8s %08X %4.4s %08X)",
local_header.signature, ACPI_CAST_PTR(void, address),
"%-4.4s " ACPI_PRINTF_UINT
" %06X (v%.2d %-6.6s %-8.8s %08X %-4.4s %08X)",
local_header.signature, ACPI_FORMAT_TO_UINT(address),
local_header.length, local_header.revision,
local_header.oem_id, local_header.oem_table_id,
local_header.oem_revision,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册