ext4: allow an active handle to be started when freezing

ext4_journal_start_sb() should not prevent an active handle from being
started due to s_frozen.  Otherwise, deadlock is easy to happen, below
is a situation.

================================================
     freeze         |       truncate
================================================
                    |  ext4_ext_truncate()
    freeze_super()  |   starts a handle
    sets s_frozen   |
                    |  ext4_ext_truncate()
                    |  holds i_data_sem
  ext4_freeze()     |
  waits for updates |
                    |  ext4_free_blocks()
                    |  calls dquot_free_block()
                    |
                    |  dquot_free_blocks()
                    |  calls ext4_dirty_inode()
                    |
                    |  ext4_dirty_inode()
                    |  trys to start an active
                    |  handle
                    |
                    |  block due to s_frozen
================================================
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

fs/ext4/super.c

@@ -242,27 +242,44 @@ static void ext4_put_nojournal(handle_t *handle)
  * journal_end calls result in the superblock being marked dirty, so
  * that sync() will call the filesystem's write_super callback if
  * appropriate.
+ *
+ * To avoid j_barrier hold in userspace when a user calls freeze(),
+ * ext4 prevents a new handle from being started by s_frozen, which
+ * is in an upper layer.
  */
 handle_t *ext4_journal_start_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nblocks)
 {
 	journal_t *journal;
+	handle_t  *handle;
 
 	if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EROFS);
 
+	journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
+	handle = ext4_journal_current_handle();
+
+	/*
+	 * If a handle has been started, it should be allowed to
+	 * finish, otherwise deadlock could happen between freeze
+	 * and others(e.g. truncate) due to the restart of the
+	 * journal handle if the filesystem is forzen and active
+	 * handles are not stopped.
+	 */
+	if (!handle)
 		vfs_check_frozen(sb, SB_FREEZE_TRANS);
-	/* Special case here: if the journal has aborted behind our
+
+	if (!journal)
+		return ext4_get_nojournal();
+	/*
+	 * Special case here: if the journal has aborted behind our
 	 * backs (eg. EIO in the commit thread), then we still need to
-	 * take the FS itself readonly cleanly. */
-	journal = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal;
-	if (journal) {
+	 * take the FS itself readonly cleanly.
+	 */
 	if (is_journal_aborted(journal)) {
 		ext4_abort(sb, "Detected aborted journal");
 		return ERR_PTR(-EROFS);
 	}
 	return jbd2_journal_start(journal, nblocks);
-	}
-	return ext4_get_nojournal();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4146,6 +4163,11 @@ static int ext4_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 /*
  * LVM calls this function before a (read-only) snapshot is created.  This
  * gives us a chance to flush the journal completely and mark the fs clean.
+ *
+ * Note that only this function cannot bring a filesystem to be in a clean
+ * state independently, because ext4 prevents a new handle from being started
+ * by @sb->s_frozen, which stays in an upper layer.  It thus needs help from
+ * the upper layer.
  */
 static int ext4_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
 {