From bb6d19846d1cee7cc977ce3aa736ec60d7163d3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:31:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Check the timeout passed to i915_wait_request We have relied upon the sole caller (wait_ioctl) validating the timeout argument. However, when waiting for multiple requests I forgot to ensure that the timeout was still positive on the later requests. This is more simply done inside __i915_wait_request. Fixes regression introduced in commit b47161858ba13c9c7e03333132230d66e008dd55 Author: Chris Wilson Date: Mon Apr 27 13:41:17 2015 +0100 drm/i915: Implement inter-engine read-read optimisations The impact of the regression is 1 jiffie for each extra active ring for a wait_ioctl with a timeout -- I don't think anyone has noticed. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Lionel Landwerlin Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1448544702-5594-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 91bb1fc27420..32e6aade6223 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -1210,8 +1210,16 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true)) return 0; - timeout_expire = timeout ? - jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout((u64)*timeout) : 0; + timeout_expire = 0; + if (timeout) { + if (WARN_ON(*timeout < 0)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (*timeout == 0) + return -ETIME; + + timeout_expire = jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(*timeout); + } if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 6) gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv, rps, req->emitted_jiffies); -- GitLab