From a56635a56f2afb3d22d9ce07e8f8d69537416b2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 05:56:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net/iucv: Add missing spin_unlock

Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path.  There seems like no reason
why the lock should continue to be held if the kzalloc fail.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@

* spin_lock(E1,...);
  <+... when != E1
  if (...) {
    ... when != E1
*   return ...;
  }
  ...+>
* spin_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
index c8b4599a752e..9637e45744fa 100644
--- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
+++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
@@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static void iucv_callback_rx(struct iucv_path *path, struct iucv_message *msg)
 save_message:
 	save_msg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sock_msg_q), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
 	if (!save_msg)
-		return;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	save_msg->path = path;
 	save_msg->msg = *msg;
 
-- 
GitLab