From 984d74a72076a12b400339973e8c98fd2fcd90e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rik van Riel Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:38:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sysrq: rcu-ify __handle_sysrq Echoing values into /proc/sysrq-trigger seems to be a popular way to get information out of the kernel. However, dumping information about thousands of processes, or hundreds of CPUs to serial console can result in IRQs being blocked for minutes, resulting in various kinds of cascade failures. The most common failure is due to interrupts being blocked for a very long time. This can lead to things like failed IO requests, and other things the system cannot easily recover from. This problem is easily fixable by making __handle_sysrq use RCU instead of spin_lock_irqsave. This leaves the warning that RCU grace periods have not elapsed for a long time, but the system will come back from that automatically. It also leaves sysrq-from-irq-context when the sysrq keys are pressed, but that is probably desired since people want that to work in situations where the system is already hosed. The callers of register_sysrq_key and unregister_sysrq_key appear to be capable of sleeping. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Reported-by: Madper Xie Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c index b767a64e49d9..7430e87d7352 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c @@ -510,9 +510,8 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask) struct sysrq_key_op *op_p; int orig_log_level; int i; - unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&sysrq_key_table_lock, flags); + rcu_read_lock(); /* * Raise the apparent loglevel to maximum so that the sysrq header * is shown to provide the user with positive feedback. We do not @@ -554,7 +553,7 @@ void __handle_sysrq(int key, bool check_mask) printk("\n"); console_loglevel = orig_log_level; } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sysrq_key_table_lock, flags); + rcu_read_unlock(); } void handle_sysrq(int key) @@ -1043,16 +1042,23 @@ static int __sysrq_swap_key_ops(int key, struct sysrq_key_op *insert_op_p, struct sysrq_key_op *remove_op_p) { int retval; - unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&sysrq_key_table_lock, flags); + spin_lock(&sysrq_key_table_lock); if (__sysrq_get_key_op(key) == remove_op_p) { __sysrq_put_key_op(key, insert_op_p); retval = 0; } else { retval = -1; } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sysrq_key_table_lock, flags); + spin_unlock(&sysrq_key_table_lock); + + /* + * A concurrent __handle_sysrq either got the old op or the new op. + * Wait for it to go away before returning, so the code for an old + * op is not freed (eg. on module unload) while it is in use. + */ + synchronize_rcu(); + return retval; } -- GitLab