提交 94073ad7 编写于 作者: C Christoph Hellwig 提交者: Jeff Layton

fs/locks: don't mess with the address limit in compat_fcntl64

Instead write a proper compat syscall that calls common helpers.

[ jlayton: fix pointer dereferencing in fixup_compat_flock ]
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
上级 a75d30c7
......@@ -506,76 +506,92 @@ convert_fcntl_cmd(unsigned int cmd)
return cmd;
}
/*
* GETLK was successful and we need to return the data, but it needs to fit in
* the compat structure.
* l_start shouldn't be too big, unless the original start + end is greater than
* COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX, in which case the app was asking for trouble, so we return
* -EOVERFLOW in that case. l_len could be too big, in which case we just
* truncate it, and only allow the app to see that part of the conflicting lock
* that might make sense to it anyway
*/
static int fixup_compat_flock(struct flock *flock)
{
if (flock->l_start > COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX)
return -EOVERFLOW;
if (flock->l_len > COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX)
flock->l_len = COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX;
return 0;
}
COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fcntl64, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, cmd,
compat_ulong_t, arg)
{
mm_segment_t old_fs;
struct flock f;
long ret;
unsigned int conv_cmd;
struct fd f = fdget_raw(fd);
struct flock flock;
long err = -EBADF;
if (!f.file)
return err;
if (unlikely(f.file->f_mode & FMODE_PATH)) {
if (!check_fcntl_cmd(cmd))
goto out_put;
}
err = security_file_fcntl(f.file, cmd, arg);
if (err)
goto out_put;
switch (cmd) {
case F_GETLK:
err = get_compat_flock(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
if (err)
break;
err = fcntl_getlk(f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
if (err)
break;
err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock);
if (err)
return err;
err = put_compat_flock(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
break;
case F_GETLK64:
case F_OFD_GETLK:
err = get_compat_flock64(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
if (err)
break;
err = fcntl_getlk(f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
if (err)
break;
err = fixup_compat_flock(&flock);
if (err)
return err;
err = put_compat_flock64(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
break;
case F_SETLK:
case F_SETLKW:
ret = get_compat_flock(&f, compat_ptr(arg));
if (ret != 0)
break;
old_fs = get_fs();
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
ret = sys_fcntl(fd, cmd, (unsigned long)&f);
set_fs(old_fs);
if (cmd == F_GETLK && ret == 0) {
/* GETLK was successful and we need to return the data...
* but it needs to fit in the compat structure.
* l_start shouldn't be too big, unless the original
* start + end is greater than COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX, in which
* case the app was asking for trouble, so we return
* -EOVERFLOW in that case.
* l_len could be too big, in which case we just truncate it,
* and only allow the app to see that part of the conflicting
* lock that might make sense to it anyway
*/
if (f.l_start > COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX)
ret = -EOVERFLOW;
if (f.l_len > COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX)
f.l_len = COMPAT_OFF_T_MAX;
if (ret == 0)
ret = put_compat_flock(&f, compat_ptr(arg));
}
err = get_compat_flock(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
if (err)
break;
err = fcntl_setlk(fd, f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
break;
case F_GETLK64:
case F_SETLK64:
case F_SETLKW64:
case F_OFD_GETLK:
case F_OFD_SETLK:
case F_OFD_SETLKW:
ret = get_compat_flock64(&f, compat_ptr(arg));
if (ret != 0)
break;
old_fs = get_fs();
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
conv_cmd = convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd);
ret = sys_fcntl(fd, conv_cmd, (unsigned long)&f);
set_fs(old_fs);
if ((conv_cmd == F_GETLK || conv_cmd == F_OFD_GETLK) && ret == 0) {
/* need to return lock information - see above for commentary */
if (f.l_start > COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX)
ret = -EOVERFLOW;
if (f.l_len > COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX)
f.l_len = COMPAT_LOFF_T_MAX;
if (ret == 0)
ret = put_compat_flock64(&f, compat_ptr(arg));
}
err = get_compat_flock64(&flock, compat_ptr(arg));
if (err)
break;
err = fcntl_setlk(fd, f.file, convert_fcntl_cmd(cmd), &flock);
break;
default:
ret = sys_fcntl(fd, cmd, arg);
err = do_fcntl(fd, cmd, arg, f.file);
break;
}
return ret;
out_put:
fdput(f);
return err;
}
COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(fcntl, unsigned int, fd, unsigned int, cmd,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册