userns: Make ucounts lock irq-safe
The ucounts_lock is being used to protect various ucounts lifecycle management functionalities. However, those services can also be invoked when a pidns is being freed in an RCU callback (e.g. softirq context). This can lead to deadlocks. There were already efforts trying to prevent similar deadlocks in add7c65c ("pid: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to ucount_lock"), however they just moved the context from hardirq to softrq. Fix this issue once and for all by explictly making the lock disable irqs altogether. Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> reported: > I've got the following deadlock report while running syzkaller fuzzer > on eec0d3d065bfcdf9cd5f56dd2a36b94d12d32297 of linux-next (on odroid > device if it matters): > > ================================= > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > 4.10.0-rc3-next-20170112-xc2-dirty #6 Not tainted > --------------------------------- > inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. > swapper/2/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: > (ucounts_lock){+.?...}, at: [< inline >] spin_lock > ./include/linux/spinlock.h:302 > (ucounts_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffff2000081678c8>] > put_ucounts+0x60/0x138 kernel/ucount.c:162 > {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: > [<ffff2000081c82d8>] mark_lock+0x220/0xb60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3054 > [< inline >] mark_irqflags kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2941 > [<ffff2000081c97a8>] __lock_acquire+0x388/0x3260 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3295 > [<ffff2000081cce24>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x138 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3753 > [< inline >] __raw_spin_lock ./include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:144 > [<ffff200009798128>] _raw_spin_lock+0x90/0xd0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 > [< inline >] spin_lock ./include/linux/spinlock.h:302 > [< inline >] get_ucounts kernel/ucount.c:131 > [<ffff200008167c28>] inc_ucount+0x80/0x6c8 kernel/ucount.c:189 > [< inline >] inc_mnt_namespaces fs/namespace.c:2818 > [<ffff200008481850>] alloc_mnt_ns+0x78/0x3a8 fs/namespace.c:2849 > [<ffff200008487298>] create_mnt_ns+0x28/0x200 fs/namespace.c:2959 > [< inline >] init_mount_tree fs/namespace.c:3199 > [<ffff200009bd6674>] mnt_init+0x258/0x384 fs/namespace.c:3251 > [<ffff200009bd60bc>] vfs_caches_init+0x6c/0x80 fs/dcache.c:3626 > [<ffff200009bb1114>] start_kernel+0x414/0x460 init/main.c:648 > [<ffff200009bb01e8>] __primary_switched+0x6c/0x70 arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:456 > irq event stamp: 2316924 > hardirqs last enabled at (2316924): [< inline >] rcu_do_batch > kernel/rcu/tree.c:2911 > hardirqs last enabled at (2316924): [< inline >] > invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3182 > hardirqs last enabled at (2316924): [< inline >] > __rcu_process_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3149 > hardirqs last enabled at (2316924): [<ffff200008210414>] > rcu_process_callbacks+0x7a4/0xc28 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3166 > hardirqs last disabled at (2316923): [< inline >] rcu_do_batch > kernel/rcu/tree.c:2900 > hardirqs last disabled at (2316923): [< inline >] > invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3182 > hardirqs last disabled at (2316923): [< inline >] > __rcu_process_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3149 > hardirqs last disabled at (2316923): [<ffff20000820fe80>] > rcu_process_callbacks+0x210/0xc28 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3166 > softirqs last enabled at (2316912): [<ffff20000811b4c4>] > _local_bh_enable+0x4c/0x80 kernel/softirq.c:155 > softirqs last disabled at (2316913): [< inline >] > do_softirq_own_stack ./include/linux/interrupt.h:488 > softirqs last disabled at (2316913): [< inline >] > invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:371 > softirqs last disabled at (2316913): [<ffff20000811c994>] > irq_exit+0x264/0x308 kernel/softirq.c:405 > > other info that might help us debug this: > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 > ---- > lock(ucounts_lock); > <Interrupt> > lock(ucounts_lock); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 1 lock held by swapper/2/0: > #0: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [< inline >] __rcu_reclaim > kernel/rcu/rcu.h:108 > #0: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [< inline >] rcu_do_batch > kernel/rcu/tree.c:2919 > #0: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [< inline >] > invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3182 > #0: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [< inline >] > __rcu_process_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3149 > #0: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [<ffff200008210390>] > rcu_process_callbacks+0x720/0xc28 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3166 > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc3-next-20170112-xc2-dirty #6 > Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-C2 (DT) > Call trace: > [<ffff20000808fa60>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x440 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:500 > [<ffff20000808fec0>] show_stack+0x20/0x30 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:225 > [<ffff2000088a99e0>] dump_stack+0x110/0x168 > [<ffff2000082fa2b4>] print_usage_bug.part.27+0x49c/0x4bc > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2387 > [< inline >] print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2357 > [< inline >] valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2400 > [< inline >] mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2617 > [<ffff2000081c89ec>] mark_lock+0x934/0xb60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3065 > [< inline >] mark_irqflags kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2923 > [<ffff2000081c9a60>] __lock_acquire+0x640/0x3260 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3295 > [<ffff2000081cce24>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x138 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3753 > [< inline >] __raw_spin_lock ./include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:144 > [<ffff200009798128>] _raw_spin_lock+0x90/0xd0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 > [< inline >] spin_lock ./include/linux/spinlock.h:302 > [<ffff2000081678c8>] put_ucounts+0x60/0x138 kernel/ucount.c:162 > [<ffff200008168364>] dec_ucount+0xf4/0x158 kernel/ucount.c:214 > [< inline >] dec_pid_namespaces kernel/pid_namespace.c:89 > [<ffff200008293dc8>] delayed_free_pidns+0x40/0xe0 kernel/pid_namespace.c:156 > [< inline >] __rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:118 > [< inline >] rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2919 > [< inline >] invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3182 > [< inline >] __rcu_process_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:3149 > [<ffff2000082103d8>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x768/0xc28 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3166 > [<ffff2000080821dc>] __do_softirq+0x324/0x6e0 kernel/softirq.c:284 > [< inline >] do_softirq_own_stack ./include/linux/interrupt.h:488 > [< inline >] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:371 > [<ffff20000811c994>] irq_exit+0x264/0x308 kernel/softirq.c:405 > [<ffff2000081ecc28>] __handle_domain_irq+0xc0/0x150 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:636 > [<ffff200008081c80>] gic_handle_irq+0x68/0xd8 > Exception stack(0xffff8000648e7dd0 to 0xffff8000648e7f00) > 7dc0: ffff8000648d4b3c 0000000000000007 > 7de0: 0000000000000000 1ffff0000c91a967 1ffff0000c91a967 1ffff0000c91a967 > 7e00: ffff20000a4b6b68 0000000000000001 0000000000000007 0000000000000001 > 7e20: 1fffe4000149ae90 ffff200009d35000 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 > 7e40: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000002624a1a 0000000000000000 > 7e60: 0000000000000000 ffff200009cbcd88 000060006d2ed000 0000000000000140 > 7e80: ffff200009cff000 ffff200009cb6000 ffff200009cc2020 ffff200009d2159d > 7ea0: 0000000000000000 ffff8000648d4380 0000000000000000 ffff8000648e7f00 > 7ec0: ffff20000820a478 ffff8000648e7f00 ffff20000820a47c 0000000010000145 > 7ee0: 0000000000000140 dfff200000000000 ffffffffffffffff ffff20000820a478 > [<ffff2000080837f8>] el1_irq+0xb8/0x130 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:486 > [< inline >] arch_local_irq_restore > ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:81 > [<ffff20000820a47c>] rcu_idle_exit+0x64/0xa8 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1030 > [< inline >] cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:200 > [<ffff2000081bcbfc>] do_idle+0x1dc/0x2d0 kernel/sched/idle.c:243 > [<ffff2000081bd1cc>] cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x28 kernel/sched/idle.c:345 > [<ffff200008099f8c>] secondary_start_kernel+0x2cc/0x358 > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:276 > [<000000000279f1a4>] 0x279f1a4 Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Tested-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Fixes: add7c65c ("pid: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to ucount_lock") Fixes: f333c700 ("pidns: Add a limit on the number of pid namespaces") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2426637.htmlSigned-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录