提交 87a6aca5 编写于 作者: G Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "tty: Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS but doesn't require a...

Revert "tty: Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS but doesn't require a VT_RELDISP ioctl call"

This reverts commit eec9fe7d.

Ari writes as the reason this should be reverted:
	The problems with this patch include:
	1. There's at least one subtlety I overlooked - switching
	between X servers (i.e. from one X VT to another) still requires
	the cooperation of both X servers. I was assuming that KMS
	eliminated this.
	2. It hasn't been tested at all (no X server patch exists which
	uses the new mode).

As he was the original author of the patch, I'll revert it.

Cc: Ari Entlich <atrigent@ccs.neu.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
上级 a3d3203e
......@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ int vt_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * file,
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
if (tmp.mode != VT_AUTO && tmp.mode != VT_PROCESS && tmp.mode != VT_PROCESS_AUTO) {
if (tmp.mode != VT_AUTO && tmp.mode != VT_PROCESS) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
......@@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static void complete_change_console(struct vc_data *vc)
* telling it that it has acquired. Also check if it has died and
* clean up (similar to logic employed in change_console())
*/
if (vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS || vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS_AUTO) {
if (vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS) {
/*
* Send the signal as privileged - kill_pid() will
* tell us if the process has gone or something else
......@@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ void change_console(struct vc_data *new_vc)
* vt to auto control.
*/
vc = vc_cons[fg_console].d;
if (vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS || vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS_AUTO) {
if (vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS) {
/*
* Send the signal as privileged - kill_pid() will
* tell us if the process has gone or something else
......@@ -1693,14 +1693,14 @@ void change_console(struct vc_data *new_vc)
*/
vc->vt_newvt = new_vc->vc_num;
if (kill_pid(vc->vt_pid, vc->vt_mode.relsig, 1) == 0) {
if(vc->vt_mode.mode == VT_PROCESS)
/*
* It worked. Mark the vt to switch to and
* return. The process needs to send us a
* VT_RELDISP ioctl to complete the switch.
*/
return;
} else {
}
/*
* The controlling process has died, so we revert back to
* normal operation. In this case, we'll also change back
......@@ -1711,10 +1711,9 @@ void change_console(struct vc_data *new_vc)
* to account for and tracking tty count may be undesirable.
*/
reset_vc(vc);
}
/*
* Fall through to normal (VT_AUTO and VT_PROCESS_AUTO) handling of the switch...
* Fall through to normal (VT_AUTO) handling of the switch...
*/
}
......
......@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct vt_mode {
#define VT_SETMODE 0x5602 /* set mode of active vt */
#define VT_AUTO 0x00 /* auto vt switching */
#define VT_PROCESS 0x01 /* process controls switching */
#define VT_PROCESS_AUTO 0x02 /* process is notified of switching */
#define VT_ACKACQ 0x02 /* acknowledge switch */
struct vt_stat {
unsigned short v_active; /* active vt */
......@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ struct vt_stat {
#define VT_SENDSIG 0x5604 /* signal to send to bitmask of vts */
#define VT_RELDISP 0x5605 /* release display */
#define VT_ACKACQ 0x02 /* acknowledge switch */
#define VT_ACTIVATE 0x5606 /* make vt active */
#define VT_WAITACTIVE 0x5607 /* wait for vt active */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册