提交 82d130ff 编写于 作者: M Miao Xie 提交者: Josef Bacik

Btrfs: fix wrong return value of btrfs_lookup_csum()

If we don't find the expected csum item, but find a csum item which is
adjacent to the specified extent, we should return -EFBIG, or we should
return -ENOENT. But btrfs_lookup_csum() return -EFBIG even the csum item
is not adjacent to the specified extent. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
上级 39847c4d
......@@ -118,9 +118,11 @@ struct btrfs_csum_item *btrfs_lookup_csum(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
csums_in_item = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, path->slots[0]);
csums_in_item /= csum_size;
if (csum_offset >= csums_in_item) {
if (csum_offset == csums_in_item) {
ret = -EFBIG;
goto fail;
} else if (csum_offset > csums_in_item) {
goto fail;
}
}
item = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_csum_item);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册