提交 80274737 编写于 作者: S Steven Whitehouse

[GFS2] Fix ordering of args for list_add

The patch to remove lock_nolock managed to get the arguments
of this list_add backwards. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
上级 2d81afb8
...@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int gfs2_mount_lockproto(char *proto_name, char *table_name, char *host_data, ...@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int gfs2_mount_lockproto(char *proto_name, char *table_name, char *host_data,
mutex_lock(&lmh_lock); mutex_lock(&lmh_lock);
if (list_empty(&nolock_proto.lw_list)) if (list_empty(&nolock_proto.lw_list))
list_add(&lmh_list, &nolock_proto.lw_list); list_add(&nolock_proto.lw_list, &lmh_list);
found = 0; found = 0;
list_for_each_entry(lw, &lmh_list, lw_list) { list_for_each_entry(lw, &lmh_list, lw_list) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册