提交 7ea4f000 编写于 作者: M Martin KaFai Lau 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ipv6: A few fixes on dereferencing rt->from

[ Upstream commit 886b7a50100a50f1cbd08a6f8ec5884dfbe082dc ]

It is a followup after the fix in
commit 9c69a1320515 ("route: Avoid crash from dereferencing NULL rt->from")

rt6_do_redirect():
1. NULL checking is needed on rt->from because a parallel
   fib6_info delete could happen that sets rt->from to NULL.
   (e.g. rt6_remove_exception() and fib6_drop_pcpu_from()).

2. fib6_info_hold() is not enough.  Same reason as (1).
   Meaning, holding dst->__refcnt cannot ensure
   rt->from is not NULL or rt->from->fib6_ref is not 0.

   Instead of using fib6_info_hold_safe() which ip6_rt_cache_alloc()
   is already doing, this patch chooses to extend the rcu section
   to keep "from" dereference-able after checking for NULL.

inet6_rtm_getroute():
1. NULL checking is also needed on rt->from for a similar reason.
   Note that inet6_rtm_getroute() is using RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED.

Fixes: a68886a6 ("net/ipv6: Make from in rt6_info rcu protected")
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
上级 3f611a47
......@@ -3454,11 +3454,8 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
rcu_read_lock();
from = rcu_dereference(rt->from);
/* This fib6_info_hold() is safe here because we hold reference to rt
* and rt already holds reference to fib6_info.
*/
fib6_info_hold(from);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (!from)
goto out;
nrt = ip6_rt_cache_alloc(from, &msg->dest, NULL);
if (!nrt)
......@@ -3470,10 +3467,7 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
nrt->rt6i_gateway = *(struct in6_addr *)neigh->primary_key;
/* No need to remove rt from the exception table if rt is
* a cached route because rt6_insert_exception() will
* takes care of it
*/
/* rt6_insert_exception() will take care of duplicated exceptions */
if (rt6_insert_exception(nrt, from)) {
dst_release_immediate(&nrt->dst);
goto out;
......@@ -3486,7 +3480,7 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
call_netevent_notifiers(NETEVENT_REDIRECT, &netevent);
out:
fib6_info_release(from);
rcu_read_unlock();
neigh_release(neigh);
}
......@@ -4991,16 +4985,20 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
rcu_read_lock();
from = rcu_dereference(rt->from);
if (from) {
if (fibmatch)
err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, NULL, NULL, NULL, iif,
RTM_NEWROUTE, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, NULL, NULL, NULL,
iif, RTM_NEWROUTE,
NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
nlh->nlmsg_seq, 0);
else
err = rt6_fill_node(net, skb, from, dst, &fl6.daddr,
&fl6.saddr, iif, RTM_NEWROUTE,
NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
0);
NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid,
nlh->nlmsg_seq, 0);
} else {
err = -ENETUNREACH;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
if (err < 0) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册