提交 78fd8c72 编写于 作者: A Andy Lutomirski 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86/vdso/pvclock: Protect STABLE check with the seqcount

If the clock becomes unstable while we're reading it, we need to
bail.  We can do this by simply moving the check into the
seqcount loop.
Reported-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/755dcedb17269e1d7ce12a9a713dea303835137e.1451949191.git.luto@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 4eaffdd5
......@@ -126,23 +126,23 @@ static notrace cycle_t vread_pvclock(int *mode)
*
* On Xen, we don't appear to have that guarantee, but Xen still
* supplies a valid seqlock using the version field.
*
* We only do pvclock vdso timing at all if
* PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT is set, and we interpret that bit to
* mean that all vCPUs have matching pvti and that the TSC is
* synced, so we can just look at vCPU 0's pvti.
*/
if (unlikely(!(pvti->flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT))) {
*mode = VCLOCK_NONE;
return 0;
}
do {
version = pvti->version;
smp_rmb();
if (unlikely(!(pvti->flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT))) {
*mode = VCLOCK_NONE;
return 0;
}
tsc = rdtsc_ordered();
pvti_tsc_to_system_mul = pvti->tsc_to_system_mul;
pvti_tsc_shift = pvti->tsc_shift;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册