From 75575ddf29cbbf8e3c96fb02ae80a33f22054aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:17:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] nfs: eliminate pointless and confusing do_vfs_lock wrappers Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker --- fs/nfs/file.c | 9 ++------- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 15 +++++---------- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c index 580d1c588228..3f1c623eee39 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/file.c +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c @@ -710,11 +710,6 @@ do_getlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local) goto out; } -static int do_vfs_lock(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl) -{ - return locks_lock_file_wait(file, fl); -} - static int do_unlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local) { @@ -747,7 +742,7 @@ do_unlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local) if (!is_local) status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl); else - status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl); + status = locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl); return status; } @@ -772,7 +767,7 @@ do_setlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local) if (!is_local) status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl); else - status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl); + status = locks_lock_file_wait(filp, fl); if (status < 0) goto out; diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index acf5a2caa423..a84612e5979e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5600,11 +5600,6 @@ static int nfs4_proc_getlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock * return err; } -static int do_vfs_lock(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl) -{ - return locks_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl); -} - struct nfs4_unlockdata { struct nfs_locku_args arg; struct nfs_locku_res res; @@ -5657,7 +5652,7 @@ static void nfs4_locku_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) switch (task->tk_status) { case 0: renew_lease(calldata->server, calldata->timestamp); - do_vfs_lock(calldata->lsp->ls_state->inode, &calldata->fl); + locks_lock_inode_wait(calldata->lsp->ls_state->inode, &calldata->fl); if (nfs4_update_lock_stateid(calldata->lsp, &calldata->res.stateid)) break; @@ -5765,7 +5760,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_unlck(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock * mutex_lock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex); /* Exclude nfs4_reclaim_open_stateid() - note nesting! */ down_read(&nfsi->rwsem); - if (do_vfs_lock(inode, request) == -ENOENT) { + if (locks_lock_inode_wait(inode, request) == -ENOENT) { up_read(&nfsi->rwsem); mutex_unlock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex); goto out; @@ -5906,7 +5901,7 @@ static void nfs4_lock_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata) data->timestamp); if (data->arg.new_lock) { data->fl.fl_flags &= ~(FL_SLEEP | FL_ACCESS); - if (do_vfs_lock(lsp->ls_state->inode, &data->fl) < 0) { + if (locks_lock_inode_wait(lsp->ls_state->inode, &data->fl) < 0) { rpc_restart_call_prepare(task); break; } @@ -6148,7 +6143,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock if (status != 0) goto out; request->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS; - status = do_vfs_lock(state->inode, request); + status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request); if (status < 0) goto out; mutex_lock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex); @@ -6157,7 +6152,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock /* Yes: cache locks! */ /* ...but avoid races with delegation recall... */ request->fl_flags = fl_flags & ~FL_SLEEP; - status = do_vfs_lock(state->inode, request); + status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request); up_read(&nfsi->rwsem); mutex_unlock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex); goto out; -- GitLab