提交 6b31d595 编写于 作者: M Michal Hocko 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm, oom: fix potential data corruption when oom_reaper races with writer

Wenwei Tao has noticed that our current assumption that the oom victim
is dying and never doing any visible changes after it dies, and so the
oom_reaper can tear it down, is not entirely true.

__task_will_free_mem consider a task dying when SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT is set
but do_group_exit sends SIGKILL to all threads _after_ the flag is set.
So there is a race window when some threads won't have
fatal_signal_pending while the oom_reaper could start unmapping the
address space.  Moreover some paths might not check for fatal signals
before each PF/g-u-p/copy_from_user.

We already have a protection for oom_reaper vs.  PF races by checking
MMF_UNSTABLE.  This has been, however, checked only for kernel threads
(use_mm users) which can outlive the oom victim.  A simple fix would be
to extend the current check in handle_mm_fault for all tasks but that
wouldn't be sufficient because the current check assumes that a kernel
thread would bail out after EFAULT from get_user*/copy_from_user and
never re-read the same address which would succeed because the PF path
has established page tables already.  This seems to be the case for the
only existing use_mm user currently (virtio driver) but it is rather
fragile in general.

This is even more fragile in general for more complex paths such as
generic_perform_write which can re-read the same address more times
(e.g.  iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic to fail and then
iov_iter_fault_in_readable on retry).

Therefore we have to implement MMF_UNSTABLE protection in a robust way
and never make a potentially corrupted content visible.  That requires
to hook deeper into the PF path and check for the flag _every time_
before a pte for anonymous memory is established (that means all
!VM_SHARED mappings).

The corruption can be triggered artificially
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201708040646.v746kkhC024636@www262.sakura.ne.jp)
but there doesn't seem to be any real life bug report.  The race window
should be quite tight to trigger most of the time.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170807113839.16695-3-mhocko@kernel.org
Fixes: aac45363 ("mm, oom: introduce oom reaper")
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: NWenwei Tao <wenwei.tww@alibaba-inc.com>
Tested-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Andrea Argangeli <andrea@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 5b53a6ea
...@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ ...@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
#include <linux/types.h> #include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <uapi/linux/oom.h> #include <uapi/linux/oom.h>
#include <linux/sched/coredump.h> /* MMF_* */
#include <linux/mm.h> /* VM_FAULT* */
struct zonelist; struct zonelist;
struct notifier_block; struct notifier_block;
...@@ -63,6 +65,26 @@ static inline bool tsk_is_oom_victim(struct task_struct * tsk) ...@@ -63,6 +65,26 @@ static inline bool tsk_is_oom_victim(struct task_struct * tsk)
return tsk->signal->oom_mm; return tsk->signal->oom_mm;
} }
/*
* Checks whether a page fault on the given mm is still reliable.
* This is no longer true if the oom reaper started to reap the
* address space which is reflected by MMF_UNSTABLE flag set in
* the mm. At that moment any !shared mapping would lose the content
* and could cause a memory corruption (zero pages instead of the
* original content).
*
* User should call this before establishing a page table entry for
* a !shared mapping and under the proper page table lock.
*
* Return 0 when the PF is safe VM_FAULT_SIGBUS otherwise.
*/
static inline int check_stable_address_space(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
if (unlikely(test_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags)))
return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
return 0;
}
extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
unsigned long totalpages); unsigned long totalpages);
......
...@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ ...@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h> #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
#include <linux/page_idle.h> #include <linux/page_idle.h>
#include <linux/shmem_fs.h> #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h> #include <asm/tlb.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
...@@ -550,6 +551,7 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, ...@@ -550,6 +551,7 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg; struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
pgtable_t pgtable; pgtable_t pgtable;
unsigned long haddr = vmf->address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK; unsigned long haddr = vmf->address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
int ret = 0;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageCompound(page), page); VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageCompound(page), page);
...@@ -561,9 +563,8 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, ...@@ -561,9 +563,8 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page,
pgtable = pte_alloc_one(vma->vm_mm, haddr); pgtable = pte_alloc_one(vma->vm_mm, haddr);
if (unlikely(!pgtable)) { if (unlikely(!pgtable)) {
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, true); ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
put_page(page); goto release;
return VM_FAULT_OOM;
} }
clear_huge_page(page, haddr, HPAGE_PMD_NR); clear_huge_page(page, haddr, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
...@@ -576,13 +577,14 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, ...@@ -576,13 +577,14 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page,
vmf->ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); vmf->ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
if (unlikely(!pmd_none(*vmf->pmd))) { if (unlikely(!pmd_none(*vmf->pmd))) {
spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); goto unlock_release;
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, true);
put_page(page);
pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable);
} else { } else {
pmd_t entry; pmd_t entry;
ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm);
if (ret)
goto unlock_release;
/* Deliver the page fault to userland */ /* Deliver the page fault to userland */
if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) { if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
int ret; int ret;
...@@ -610,6 +612,15 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page, ...@@ -610,6 +612,15 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page,
} }
return 0; return 0;
unlock_release:
spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
release:
if (pgtable)
pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable);
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, true);
put_page(page);
return ret;
} }
/* /*
...@@ -688,7 +699,10 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) ...@@ -688,7 +699,10 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
ret = 0; ret = 0;
set = false; set = false;
if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd)) { if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd)) {
if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) { ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm);
if (ret) {
spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
} else if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
ret = handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_MISSING); ret = handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_MISSING);
VM_BUG_ON(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK); VM_BUG_ON(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK);
......
...@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ ...@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
#include <linux/debugfs.h> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h> #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
#include <linux/dax.h> #include <linux/dax.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
#include <asm/io.h> #include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
...@@ -2893,6 +2894,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) ...@@ -2893,6 +2894,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg; struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
struct page *page; struct page *page;
int ret = 0;
pte_t entry; pte_t entry;
/* File mapping without ->vm_ops ? */ /* File mapping without ->vm_ops ? */
...@@ -2925,6 +2927,9 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) ...@@ -2925,6 +2927,9 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte)) if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte))
goto unlock; goto unlock;
ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm);
if (ret)
goto unlock;
/* Deliver the page fault to userland, check inside PT lock */ /* Deliver the page fault to userland, check inside PT lock */
if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) { if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
...@@ -2959,6 +2964,10 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) ...@@ -2959,6 +2964,10 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte)) if (!pte_none(*vmf->pte))
goto release; goto release;
ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm);
if (ret)
goto release;
/* Deliver the page fault to userland, check inside PT lock */ /* Deliver the page fault to userland, check inside PT lock */
if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) { if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) {
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
...@@ -2978,7 +2987,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) ...@@ -2978,7 +2987,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte); update_mmu_cache(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
unlock: unlock:
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
return 0; return ret;
release: release:
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false); mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
put_page(page); put_page(page);
...@@ -3252,7 +3261,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, ...@@ -3252,7 +3261,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) int finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{ {
struct page *page; struct page *page;
int ret; int ret = 0;
/* Did we COW the page? */ /* Did we COW the page? */
if ((vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && if ((vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) &&
...@@ -3260,6 +3269,14 @@ int finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf) ...@@ -3260,6 +3269,14 @@ int finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
page = vmf->cow_page; page = vmf->cow_page;
else else
page = vmf->page; page = vmf->page;
/*
* check even for read faults because we might have lost our CoWed
* page
*/
if (!(vmf->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
ret = check_stable_address_space(vmf->vma->vm_mm);
if (!ret)
ret = alloc_set_pte(vmf, vmf->memcg, page); ret = alloc_set_pte(vmf, vmf->memcg, page);
if (vmf->pte) if (vmf->pte)
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
...@@ -3900,29 +3917,6 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, ...@@ -3900,29 +3917,6 @@ int handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(false); mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(false);
} }
/*
* This mm has been already reaped by the oom reaper and so the
* refault cannot be trusted in general. Anonymous refaults would
* lose data and give a zero page instead e.g. This is especially
* problem for use_mm() because regular tasks will just die and
* the corrupted data will not be visible anywhere while kthread
* will outlive the oom victim and potentially propagate the date
* further.
*/
if (unlikely((current->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && !(ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR)
&& test_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &vma->vm_mm->flags))) {
/*
* We are going to enforce SIGBUS but the PF path might have
* dropped the mmap_sem already so take it again so that
* we do not break expectations of all arch specific PF paths
* and g-u-p
*/
if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)
down_read(&vma->vm_mm->mmap_sem);
ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
}
return ret; return ret;
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_mm_fault); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_mm_fault);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册