From 5ea80e4910cd47270ae4c13b1fce0899aaa28410 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sachin Kamat Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:05:57 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] gpio: mxc: Do not hard code return value Silences the following warning: why not propagate 'port->irq' from platform_get_irq() instead of (-22)? Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c index 3307f6db3a92..db83b3c0a449 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) port->irq_high = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); if (port->irq < 0) - return -EINVAL; + return port->irq; /* disable the interrupt and clear the status */ writel(0, port->base + GPIO_IMR); -- GitLab