提交 5d12f905 编写于 作者: J Jens Axboe

blk-mq: fix wrong usage of hctx->state vs hctx->flags

BLK_MQ_F_* flags are for hctx->flags, and are non-atomic and
set at registration time. BLK_MQ_S_* flags are dynamic and
atomic, and are accessed through hctx->state.

Some of the BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED uses were wrong. Additionally,
the header file should not use a bit shift for the _S_ flags,
as they are done through the set/test_bit functions.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
上级 95363efd
......@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
int bit, queued;
if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->flags)))
if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state)))
return;
hctx->run++;
......@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
{
if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->flags)))
if (unlikely(test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state)))
return;
if (!async)
......@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_queues(struct request_queue *q, bool async)
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
if ((!blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx) &&
list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch)) ||
test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->flags))
test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state))
continue;
blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, async);
......
......@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ enum {
BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_SORT = 1 << 1,
BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_IPI = 1 << 2,
BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED = 1 << 0,
BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED = 0,
BLK_MQ_MAX_DEPTH = 2048,
};
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册