From 5664aa1c9ef59895eee1af15e36140d09d20714d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:46:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: use dwapb_read instead of readl_relaxed

Commit 67809b974a07 ("GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Change readl&writel to
dwapb_read&dwapb_write") missed this readl_relaxed() usage, I'm not
sure the reason, maybe for performance reason? But if we do care
the performance, we could use the relaxed io in dwapb_read and
dwapb_write.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index 53ade0b69f49..f051c4552af5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void dwapb_toggle_trigger(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio, unsigned int offs)
 
 static u32 dwapb_do_irq(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
 {
-	u32 irq_status = readl_relaxed(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTSTATUS);
+	u32 irq_status = dwapb_read(gpio, GPIO_INTSTATUS);
 	u32 ret = irq_status;
 
 	while (irq_status) {
-- 
GitLab